PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTR vs. AUCO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTR vs. AUCO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategy Inc (MSTR) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTR achieves a -22.99% return, which is significantly lower than AUCO.L's -8.56% return. Over the past 10 years, MSTR has outperformed AUCO.L with an annualized return of 20.08%, while AUCO.L has yielded a comparatively lower 14.35% annualized return.


MSTR

1D
-8.00%
1M
-37.62%
YTD
-22.99%
6M
-38.08%
1Y
-70.16%
3Y*
60.63%
5Y*
18.13%
10Y*
20.08%

AUCO.L

1D
-1.44%
1M
-16.15%
YTD
-8.56%
6M
-1.88%
1Y
54.19%
3Y*
46.28%
5Y*
20.71%
10Y*
14.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTR vs. AUCO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSTR
Strategy Inc
-22.99%-47.53%358.54%346.15%-74.00%40.13%172.42%11.65%-2.70%-33.49%
AUCO.L
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF
-8.56%181.83%17.96%15.02%-14.30%-10.12%21.72%44.14%-10.42%10.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTR and AUCO.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2008

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTR vs. AUCO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTR
MSTR Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
MSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

AUCO.L
AUCO.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
AUCO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTR vs. AUCO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Inc (MSTR) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSTRAUCO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.21

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

1.70

-2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.34

4.45

-5.78

MSTR vs. AUCO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTR Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the AUCO.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTR and AUCO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSTRAUCO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.99

1.18

-2.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.54

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.40

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.20

-0.07

Drawdowns

MSTR vs. AUCO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTR drawdown since its inception was -99.86%, which is greater than AUCO.L's maximum drawdown of -78.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTR and AUCO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTRAUCO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.86%

-78.30%

-21.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.53%

-31.80%

-44.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.42%

-31.80%

-45.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.11%

-48.62%

-35.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.27%

-54.47%

-34.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.30%

-31.80%

-43.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.46%

-40.79%

-45.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

52.40%

12.15%

+40.25%

Volatility

MSTR vs. AUCO.L - Volatility Comparison

Strategy Inc (MSTR) has a higher volatility of 21.50% compared to L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) at 15.14%. This indicates that MSTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUCO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTRAUCO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.50%

15.14%

+6.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.25%

36.64%

+20.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.09%

45.89%

+25.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.80%

38.20%

+52.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.81%

35.40%

+38.41%

Dividends

MSTR vs. AUCO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSTR nor AUCO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTR and AUCO.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTR and AUCO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer