PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTR vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MSTR vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategy Inc (MSTR) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTR achieves a -16.29% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 8.18% return. Over the past 10 years, MSTR has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 21.08%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 13.45% annualized return.


MSTR

1D
5.61%
1M
-32.19%
YTD
-16.29%
6M
-30.75%
1Y
-66.03%
3Y*
65.16%
5Y*
19.92%
10Y*
21.08%

^GSPC

1D
0.30%
1M
0.09%
YTD
8.18%
6M
8.17%
1Y
23.42%
3Y*
19.88%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*
13.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTR vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSTR
Strategy Inc
-16.29%-47.53%358.54%346.15%-74.00%40.13%172.42%11.65%-2.70%-33.49%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
8.18%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTR and ^GSPC is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 1998

0.46

The correlation between MSTR and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTR vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTR
MSTR Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTR vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Inc (MSTR) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSTR^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.35

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

2.59

-3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.27

11.84

-13.11

MSTR vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTR Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTR and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSTR^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.94

1.94

-2.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.71

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.75

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.47

-0.35

Drawdowns

MSTR vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTR drawdown since its inception was -99.86%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTR and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTR^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.86%

-56.78%

-43.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.53%

-9.10%

-67.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.42%

-18.90%

-58.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.11%

-25.43%

-58.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.27%

-33.92%

-55.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.15%

-2.68%

-70.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.47%

-10.72%

-75.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

52.19%

1.98%

+50.21%

Volatility

MSTR vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Strategy Inc (MSTR) has a higher volatility of 21.43% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.80%. This indicates that MSTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTR^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.43%

3.80%

+17.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.80%

9.41%

+47.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.82%

12.17%

+58.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.87%

16.94%

+73.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.77%

18.09%

+55.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTR and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTR has higher volatility (21.43%) compared to ^GSPC (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTR dropped -99.86% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTR and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer