PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTQX vs. FTZIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTQX vs. FTZIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund (MSTQX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTQX achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly lower than FTZIX's 24.27% return.


MSTQX

1D
0.79%
1M
0.63%
6M
4.49%
YTD
7.20%
1Y
-4.75%
3Y*
8.21%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.28%

FTZIX

1D
0.30%
1M
0.61%
6M
18.36%
YTD
24.27%
1Y
43.22%
3Y*
25.94%
5Y*
14.43%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MSTQX vs. FTZIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MSTQX
Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund
7.20%-5.56%18.94%25.24%-16.29%26.15%10.49%26.02%0.68%
FTZIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund
24.27%22.63%25.31%27.18%-21.31%25.25%19.60%33.70%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTQX and FTZIX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2018

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between MSTQX and FTZIX has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTQX vs. FTZIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSTQX
MSTQX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MSTQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTQX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTQX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FTZIX
FTZIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FTZIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTZIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTZIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FTZIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTZIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSTQX vs. FTZIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund (MSTQX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSTQXFTZIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.40

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

4.67

-4.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.55

17.14

-17.69

MSTQX vs. FTZIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTQX Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the FTZIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTQX and FTZIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSTQX vs. FTZIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTQX drawdown since its inception was -36.23%, roughly equal to the maximum FTZIX drawdown of -37.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTQX and FTZIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTQXFTZIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.23%

-37.22%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.58%

-9.03%

-12.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.58%

-18.65%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

-29.53%

+5.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.62%

-1.33%

-9.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.36%

-6.40%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.43%

2.45%

+7.98%

Volatility

MSTQX vs. FTZIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund (MSTQX) is 2.92%, while Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that MSTQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTZIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTQXFTZIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

4.82%

-1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.91%

13.63%

-4.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.12%

17.23%

+2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.60%

19.59%

-0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.56%

22.26%

-1.70%

MSTQX vs. FTZIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTQX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FTZIX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSTQX vs. FTZIX - Dividend Comparison

MSTQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than FTZIX's 0.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FTZIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund
0.04%0.05%0.11%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.26%0.76%0.00%
MSTQX
Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund
0.64%0.69%10.80%4.21%9.79%15.98%2.15%2.04%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTQX and FTZIX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTZIX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to MSTQX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTQX dropped -36.23% vs FTZIX's -37.22%.

FTZIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTQX and FTZIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer