MSTQX vs. FLCPX
MSTQX (Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund) and FLCPX (Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MSTQX returned 5.69%/yr vs 13.92%/yr for FLCPX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MSTQX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FLCPX.
Performance
MSTQX vs. FLCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTQX achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly lower than FLCPX's 10.91% return.
MSTQX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- -11.30%
- 1Y
- -2.27%
- 3Y*
- 10.11%
- 5Y*
- 5.69%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCPX
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 4.17%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.82%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.48%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
MSTQX vs. FLCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTQX Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund | 5.36% | -5.56% | 18.94% | 25.24% | -16.29% | 26.15% | 10.49% | 26.02% | -10.45% |
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund | 10.91% | 17.84% | 25.08% | 26.25% | -18.06% | 28.61% | 18.24% | 31.59% | -8.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTQX and FLCPX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2018 | 0.90 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MSTQX and FLCPX has dropped to 0.68 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTQX vs. FLCPX — Risk / Return Rank
MSTQX
FLCPX
MSTQX vs. FLCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund (MSTQX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTQX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.43 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 3.18 | -3.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 14.85 | -15.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTQX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 | 2.38 | -2.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.82 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.92 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
MSTQX vs. FLCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTQX drawdown since its inception was -36.23%, which is greater than FLCPX's maximum drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTQX and FLCPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTQX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.23% | -33.87% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.58% | -8.89% | -12.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.58% | -18.76% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.61% | -24.40% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.16% | -0.72% | -11.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -4.19% | -2.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.57% | 1.90% | +7.67% |
Volatility
MSTQX vs. FLCPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund (MSTQX) is 2.62%, while Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that MSTQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTQX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 2.91% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.33% | 9.00% | +9.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.09% | 11.88% | +8.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 17.07% | +1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 18.16% | +2.55% |
MSTQX vs. FLCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTQX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCPX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTQX vs. FLCPX - Dividend Comparison
MSTQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than FLCPX's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund | 0.51% | 0.56% | 6.11% | 7.05% | 11.23% | 10.38% | 3.93% | 1.74% | 2.18% | 1.57% | 0.76% |
MSTQX Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund | 0.65% | 0.69% | 10.80% | 4.21% | 9.79% | 15.98% | 2.15% | 2.04% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTQX and FLCPX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLCPX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to MSTQX (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTQX dropped -36.23% vs FLCPX's -33.87%.
FLCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTQX and FLCPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer