MSTQX vs. AMFEX
MSTQX (Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund) and AMFEX (AAMA Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MSTQX returned 6.04%/yr vs 10.69%/yr for AMFEX. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MSTQX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for AMFEX.
Performance
MSTQX vs. AMFEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTQX achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly lower than AMFEX's 13.57% return.
MSTQX
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 7.20%
- 1Y
- -4.75%
- 3Y*
- 8.21%
- 5Y*
- 6.04%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.28%
AMFEX
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 8.82%
- YTD
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 24.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.69%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AMFEX AAMA Equity Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MSTQX vs. AMFEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTQX Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund | 7.20% | -5.56% | 18.94% | 25.24% | -16.29% | 26.15% | 10.49% | 26.02% | -10.63% |
AMFEX AAMA Equity Fund | 13.57% | 17.33% | 16.28% | 17.32% | -14.08% | 22.58% | 12.70% | 24.62% | -9.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTQX and AMFEX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2018 | 0.88 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MSTQX and AMFEX has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTQX vs. AMFEX — Risk / Return Rank
MSTQX
AMFEX
MSTQX vs. AMFEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund (MSTQX) and AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSTQX | AMFEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.39 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 3.69 | -3.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.55 | 15.37 | -15.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSTQX vs. AMFEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTQX drawdown since its inception was -36.23%, which is greater than AMFEX's maximum drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTQX and AMFEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTQX | AMFEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.23% | -30.41% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.58% | -6.07% | -15.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.58% | -15.23% | -6.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.61% | -21.21% | -2.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.62% | -0.42% | -10.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.36% | -4.24% | -2.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.43% | 1.46% | +8.97% |
Volatility
MSTQX vs. AMFEX - Volatility Comparison
Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund (MSTQX) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX) at 2.37%. This indicates that MSTQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTQX | AMFEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 2.37% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.91% | 7.74% | +1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.12% | 10.10% | +10.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 14.22% | +4.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.56% | 16.84% | +3.72% |
MSTQX vs. AMFEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTQX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFEX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTQX vs. AMFEX - Dividend Comparison
MSTQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than AMFEX's 10.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMFEX AAMA Equity Fund | 10.56% | 11.99% | 9.19% | 0.92% | 4.82% | 0.22% | 0.44% | 0.78% | 0.83% |
MSTQX Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund | 0.64% | 0.69% | 10.80% | 4.21% | 9.79% | 15.98% | 2.15% | 2.04% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTQX and AMFEX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTQX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to AMFEX (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTQX dropped -36.23% vs AMFEX's -30.41%.
AMFEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTQX and AMFEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer