PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTQ vs. TLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MSTQ vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MSTQ vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MSTQ
LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF
-5.71%20.57%19.58%43.10%-15.02%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
1.44%11.36%-2.18%0.73%-11.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTQ achieves a -5.71% return, which is significantly lower than TLTW's 1.44% return.


MSTQ

1D
2.40%
1M
-4.26%
YTD
-5.71%
6M
-4.78%
1Y
23.75%
3Y*
18.23%
5Y*
10Y*

TLTW

1D
0.22%
1M
-2.98%
YTD
1.44%
6M
2.22%
1Y
7.46%
3Y*
0.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MSTQ vs. TLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTQ has a 1.59% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTW's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MSTQ vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTQ
MSTQ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
MSTQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTW
TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTQ vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSTQTLTWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

0.84

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.12

1.17

+0.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.15

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

1.42

+0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.30

3.74

+2.56

MSTQ vs. TLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the TLTW Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTQ and TLTW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSTQTLTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

0.84

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

-0.03

+0.61

Correlation

The correlation between MSTQ and TLTW is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MSTQ vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison

MSTQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.81%, more than TLTW's 13.66% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
MSTQ
LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF
14.81%13.97%3.72%0.77%0.00%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
13.66%14.82%14.47%19.59%8.71%

Drawdowns

MSTQ vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTQ drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, which is greater than TLTW's maximum drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTQ and TLTW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTQTLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.05%

-18.61%

-12.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.39%

-5.80%

-6.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.29%

-2.98%

-7.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.91%

-8.49%

-0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

2.20%

+1.56%

Volatility

MSTQ vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison

LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) at 3.46%. This indicates that MSTQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MSTQTLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

3.46%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.28%

5.80%

+5.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.35%

8.91%

+7.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.98%

11.55%

+7.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.98%

11.55%

+7.43%