MSTQ vs. EINC
MSTQ (LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTQ is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Little Harbor Advisors, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. MSTQ is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MSTQ returned 21.44%/yr vs 30.36%/yr for EINC. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSTQ charges 1.59%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.
Performance
MSTQ vs. EINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTQ achieves a 12.49% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 25.97% return.
MSTQ
- 1D
- -2.91%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 12.49%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 26.47%
- 3Y*
- 21.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EINC
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -4.50%
- YTD
- 25.97%
- 6M
- 25.98%
- 1Y
- 29.82%
- 3Y*
- 30.36%
- 5Y*
- 21.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
MSTQ vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTQ LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF | 12.49% | 20.57% | 19.58% | 43.10% | -21.50% |
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 25.97% | 7.11% | 42.79% | 15.55% | 6.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTQ and EINC is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2022 | 0.22 |
The correlation between MSTQ and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTQ vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank
MSTQ
EINC
MSTQ vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSTQ | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.35 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 3.80 | -1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.57 | 9.63 | -3.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSTQ vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTQ drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTQ and EINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTQ | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.05% | -87.55% | +56.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.39% | -7.89% | -4.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.22% | -16.01% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.38% | -4.50% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.55% | -44.15% | +35.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 3.10% | +0.94% |
Volatility
MSTQ vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison
LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ) has a higher volatility of 7.78% compared to VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) at 6.51%. This indicates that MSTQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTQ | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.78% | 6.51% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.35% | 11.88% | +0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.87% | 15.10% | +0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 19.54% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 25.43% | -6.37% |
MSTQ vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTQ has a 1.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTQ vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison
MSTQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.42%, more than EINC's 3.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.51% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
MSTQ LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF | 12.42% | 13.97% | 3.72% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTQ and EINC have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTQ has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to EINC (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTQ dropped -31.05% vs EINC's -87.55%.
On 3-year performance, EINC leads with 30.36% vs 21.44% for MSTQ. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 6.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EINC has performed better with a 30.36% return vs 21.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.59% for MSTQ.
MSTQ has the higher dividend yield at 12.42%, compared with 3.51% for EINC.
MSTQ is categorized as Options Trading, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Little Harbor Advisors and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.59% for MSTQ and 0.45% for EINC.
EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTQ and EINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer