MSTK vs. BKNU
MSTK (Tuttle Capital MSTR 0DTE Covered Call ETF) and BKNU (T-Rex 2X Long BKNG Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTK is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Tuttle Capital Management, while BKNU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tuttle Capital Management. Both are actively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSTK charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for BKNU.
Performance
MSTK vs. BKNU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MSTK
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKNU
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTK vs. BKNU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTK Tuttle Capital MSTR 0DTE Covered Call ETF | -20.94% | -47.46% |
BKNU T-Rex 2X Long BKNG Daily Target ETF | -39.53% | 0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTK and BKNU is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTK vs. BKNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tuttle Capital MSTR 0DTE Covered Call ETF (MSTK) and T-Rex 2X Long BKNG Daily Target ETF (BKNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSTK vs. BKNU - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility
MSTK vs. BKNU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
MSTK vs. BKNU - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTK has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than BKNU's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTK vs. BKNU - Dividend Comparison
MSTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.03%, while BKNU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BKNU T-Rex 2X Long BKNG Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSTK Tuttle Capital MSTR 0DTE Covered Call ETF | 49.03% | 26.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTK and BKNU have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSTK is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSTK is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BKNU.
MSTK has the higher dividend yield at 49.03%, compared with 0.00% for BKNU.
MSTK is categorized as Derivative Income, while BKNU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSTK and 1.50% for BKNU.
Find the right allocation for MSTK and BKNU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer