MSTGX vs. MSTQX
MSTGX (Morningstar Global Income Fund) and MSTQX (Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - MSTGX is a Global Allocation fund managed by Morningstar, while MSTQX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Morningstar. Over the past 5 years, MSTGX returned 4.65%/yr vs 6.17%/yr for MSTQX. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MSTGX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MSTQX.
Performance
MSTGX vs. MSTQX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTGX achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly lower than MSTQX's 7.87% return.
MSTGX
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 6.95%
- 1Y
- 10.45%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.57%
MSTQX
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 7.87%
- 1Y
- -4.15%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 6.17%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MSTGX vs. MSTQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTGX Morningstar Global Income Fund | 6.95% | 12.04% | 5.36% | 11.91% | -11.18% | 8.46% | 3.92% | 19.97% | -3.56% |
MSTQX Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund | 7.87% | -5.56% | 18.94% | 25.24% | -16.29% | 26.15% | 10.49% | 26.02% | -10.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTGX and MSTQX is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2018 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MSTGX and MSTQX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTGX vs. MSTQX — Risk / Return Rank
MSTGX
MSTQX
MSTGX vs. MSTQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morningstar Global Income Fund (MSTGX) and Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund (MSTQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSTGX | MSTQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 0.96 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | -0.23 | +3.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.26 | -0.44 | +9.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSTGX vs. MSTQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTGX drawdown since its inception was -27.52%, smaller than the maximum MSTQX drawdown of -36.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTGX and MSTQX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTGX | MSTQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.52% | -36.23% | +8.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.38% | -21.58% | +17.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.56% | -21.58% | +15.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.64% | -23.61% | +3.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -10.07% | +9.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.25% | -6.36% | +2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.27% | 10.45% | -9.18% |
Volatility
MSTGX vs. MSTQX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Morningstar Global Income Fund (MSTGX) is 1.66%, while Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund (MSTQX) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that MSTGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTGX | MSTQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.66% | 2.95% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.92% | 8.92% | -4.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.35% | 20.13% | -13.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.11% | 18.59% | -10.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.75% | 20.56% | -9.81% |
MSTGX vs. MSTQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTGX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTQX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTGX vs. MSTQX - Dividend Comparison
MSTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, more than MSTQX's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTGX Morningstar Global Income Fund | 3.46% | 2.97% | 6.64% | 6.32% | 8.79% | 10.48% | 2.96% | 4.11% | 0.56% |
MSTQX Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund | 0.64% | 0.69% | 10.80% | 4.21% | 9.79% | 15.98% | 2.15% | 2.04% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTGX and MSTQX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTQX has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to MSTGX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTGX dropped -27.52% vs MSTQX's -36.23%.
MSTGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTGX and MSTQX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer