MSTBX vs. TNSHX
MSTBX (Morningstar Defensive Bond Fund) and TNSHX (TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, MSTBX returned 2.34%/yr vs 1.79%/yr for TNSHX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSTBX charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for TNSHX.
Performance
MSTBX vs. TNSHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTBX achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly lower than TNSHX's 0.51% return.
MSTBX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 2.36%
- 3Y*
- 4.76%
- 5Y*
- 2.34%
- 10Y*
- —
TNSHX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 3.41%
- 3Y*
- 4.22%
- 5Y*
- 1.79%
- 10Y*
- 1.82%
MSTBX vs. TNSHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTBX Morningstar Defensive Bond Fund | -0.22% | 5.19% | 4.52% | 7.16% | -4.73% | 0.84% | 4.75% | 3.53% | 0.39% |
TNSHX TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund | 0.51% | 5.31% | 4.03% | 4.05% | -3.96% | -0.57% | 3.26% | 4.05% | 1.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTBX and TNSHX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2018 | 0.71 |
The correlation between MSTBX and TNSHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTBX vs. TNSHX — Risk / Return Rank
MSTBX
TNSHX
MSTBX vs. TNSHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morningstar Defensive Bond Fund (MSTBX) and TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTBX | TNSHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.49 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 3.23 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.68 | 12.05 | -5.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTBX | TNSHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 1.95 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.80 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.37 | 1.04 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
MSTBX vs. TNSHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTBX drawdown since its inception was -6.31%, which is greater than TNSHX's maximum drawdown of -5.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTBX and TNSHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTBX | TNSHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.31% | -5.99% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.41% | -1.13% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.42% | -1.13% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.31% | -5.99% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -0.25% | -0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.02% | -0.89% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.49% | 0.30% | +0.19% |
Volatility
MSTBX vs. TNSHX - Volatility Comparison
Morningstar Defensive Bond Fund (MSTBX) has a higher volatility of 0.67% compared to TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX) at 0.63%. This indicates that MSTBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNSHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTBX | TNSHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | 0.63% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.47% | 1.34% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14% | 1.88% | +0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.38% | 2.25% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.09% | 1.82% | +0.27% |
MSTBX vs. TNSHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTBX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than TNSHX's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTBX vs. TNSHX - Dividend Comparison
MSTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than TNSHX's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTBX Morningstar Defensive Bond Fund | 2.46% | 2.79% | 4.23% | 3.80% | 2.64% | 2.64% | 3.17% | 2.69% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TNSHX TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund | 4.11% | 4.22% | 3.94% | 2.68% | 1.00% | 1.03% | 1.81% | 2.45% | 1.80% | 1.31% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTBX and TNSHX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTBX has higher volatility (0.67%) compared to TNSHX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTBX dropped -6.31% vs TNSHX's -5.99%.
TNSHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTBX and TNSHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer