PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTBX vs. TNSHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTBX vs. TNSHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morningstar Defensive Bond Fund (MSTBX) and TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTBX achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly lower than TNSHX's 0.51% return.


MSTBX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
-0.22%
6M
0.10%
1Y
2.36%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
2.34%
10Y*

TNSHX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.51%
6M
0.96%
1Y
3.41%
3Y*
4.22%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*
1.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTBX vs. TNSHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MSTBX
Morningstar Defensive Bond Fund
-0.22%5.19%4.52%7.16%-4.73%0.84%4.75%3.53%0.39%
TNSHX
TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund
0.51%5.31%4.03%4.05%-3.96%-0.57%3.26%4.05%1.11%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTBX and TNSHX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2018

0.71

The correlation between MSTBX and TNSHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTBX vs. TNSHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTBX
MSTBX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MSTBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

TNSHX
TNSHX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TNSHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNSHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNSHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
TNSHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNSHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTBX vs. TNSHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morningstar Defensive Bond Fund (MSTBX) and TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSTBXTNSHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.49

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

3.23

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.68

12.05

-5.37

MSTBX vs. TNSHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the TNSHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTBX and TNSHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSTBXTNSHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

1.95

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.80

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.37

1.04

+0.33

Drawdowns

MSTBX vs. TNSHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTBX drawdown since its inception was -6.31%, which is greater than TNSHX's maximum drawdown of -5.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTBX and TNSHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTBXTNSHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.31%

-5.99%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.41%

-1.13%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.42%

-1.13%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.31%

-5.99%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-0.25%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.02%

-0.89%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.49%

0.30%

+0.19%

Volatility

MSTBX vs. TNSHX - Volatility Comparison

Morningstar Defensive Bond Fund (MSTBX) has a higher volatility of 0.67% compared to TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX) at 0.63%. This indicates that MSTBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNSHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTBXTNSHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

0.63%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.47%

1.34%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14%

1.88%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.38%

2.25%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.09%

1.82%

+0.27%

MSTBX vs. TNSHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTBX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than TNSHX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSTBX vs. TNSHX - Dividend Comparison

MSTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than TNSHX's 4.11% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MSTBX
Morningstar Defensive Bond Fund
2.46%2.79%4.23%3.80%2.64%2.64%3.17%2.69%0.29%0.00%0.00%
TNSHX
TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund
4.11%4.22%3.94%2.68%1.00%1.03%1.81%2.45%1.80%1.31%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTBX and TNSHX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTBX has higher volatility (0.67%) compared to TNSHX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTBX dropped -6.31% vs TNSHX's -5.99%.

TNSHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTBX and TNSHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer