PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTB vs. HEGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTB vs. HEGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) and Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTB achieves a 8.71% return, which is significantly higher than HEGD's 6.84% return.


MSTB

1D
-0.60%
1M
3.88%
YTD
8.71%
6M
8.70%
1Y
20.33%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
8.55%
10Y*

HEGD

1D
-0.63%
1M
3.52%
YTD
6.84%
6M
6.23%
1Y
17.89%
3Y*
14.64%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTB vs. HEGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MSTB
LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF
8.71%18.57%18.82%16.94%-22.72%21.89%1.71%
HEGD
Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF
6.84%12.95%15.24%14.16%-11.25%17.30%0.99%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTB and HEGD is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020

0.84

The correlation between MSTB and HEGD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

MSTB vs. HEGD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSTB
HEGD

Technology

36.1%
36.1%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.8%

Communication Services

10.9%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.2%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

MSTB
36.1%
HEGD
36.1%

Financial Services

MSTB
11.9%
HEGD
11.8%

Communication Services

MSTB
10.9%
HEGD
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MSTB
10.1%
HEGD
10.1%

Healthcare

MSTB
8.4%
HEGD
8.4%

Industrials

MSTB
8.2%
HEGD
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

MSTB
4.9%
HEGD
4.9%

Energy

MSTB
3.5%
HEGD
3.5%

Utilities

MSTB
2.3%
HEGD
2.3%

Real Estate

MSTB
1.9%
HEGD
1.9%

Basic Materials

MSTB
1.8%
HEGD
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTB vs. HEGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTB
MSTB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MSTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTB Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

HEGD
HEGD Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
HEGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEGD Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HEGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEGD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTB vs. HEGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) and Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSTBHEGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.47

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

4.10

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.32

16.25

-6.93

MSTB vs. HEGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTB Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the HEGD Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTB and HEGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSTBHEGDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

2.59

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.97

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

1.06

-0.23

Drawdowns

MSTB vs. HEGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTB drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, which is greater than HEGD's maximum drawdown of -14.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTB and HEGD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTBHEGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.64%

-14.56%

-11.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-4.39%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.81%

-8.14%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.64%

-14.56%

-11.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-0.63%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-3.66%

-3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

1.10%

+1.09%

Volatility

MSTB vs. HEGD - Volatility Comparison

LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) at 2.34%. This indicates that MSTB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTBHEGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

2.34%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.43%

4.95%

+2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.21%

6.96%

+3.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.97%

9.40%

+4.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.84%

9.35%

+4.49%

MSTB vs. HEGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTB has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HEGD's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSTB vs. HEGD - Dividend Comparison

MSTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, more than HEGD's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
HEGD
Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF
0.34%0.36%0.43%0.39%0.87%0.31%0.00%
MSTB
LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF
0.38%0.41%0.95%0.16%1.34%2.20%1.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTB and HEGD have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTB has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to HEGD (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTB dropped -25.64% vs HEGD's -14.56%.

On 5-year performance, HEGD leads with 9.03% vs 8.55% for MSTB. On fees, HEGD is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, HEGD has been the lower-risk option at 2.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HEGD has performed better with a 9.03% return vs 8.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HEGD is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 1.40% for MSTB.

MSTB has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.34% for HEGD.

MSTB tracks S&P 500® Index, while HEGD tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Little Harbor Advisors and Swan. Their fees differ too: 1.40% for MSTB and 0.88% for HEGD.

HEGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTB and HEGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer