MSTB vs. HEGD
MSTB (LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF) and HEGD (Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds - MSTB tracks the S&P 500® Index while HEGD tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MSTB returned 8.55%/yr vs 9.03%/yr for HEGD. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MSTB charges 1.40%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for HEGD.
Performance
MSTB vs. HEGD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTB achieves a 8.71% return, which is significantly higher than HEGD's 6.84% return.
MSTB
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 8.71%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- 1Y
- 20.33%
- 3Y*
- 18.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.55%
- 10Y*
- —
HEGD
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 6.84%
- 6M
- 6.23%
- 1Y
- 17.89%
- 3Y*
- 14.64%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- —
MSTB vs. HEGD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTB LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF | 8.71% | 18.57% | 18.82% | 16.94% | -22.72% | 21.89% | 1.71% |
HEGD Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF | 6.84% | 12.95% | 15.24% | 14.16% | -11.25% | 17.30% | 0.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTB and HEGD is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020 | 0.84 |
The correlation between MSTB and HEGD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
MSTB vs. HEGD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MSTB
HEGD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
MSTB
HEGD
Financial Services
MSTB
HEGD
Communication Services
MSTB
HEGD
Consumer Cyclical
MSTB
HEGD
Healthcare
MSTB
HEGD
Industrials
MSTB
HEGD
Consumer Defensive
MSTB
HEGD
Energy
MSTB
HEGD
Utilities
MSTB
HEGD
Real Estate
MSTB
HEGD
Basic Materials
MSTB
HEGD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTB vs. HEGD — Risk / Return Rank
MSTB
HEGD
MSTB vs. HEGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) and Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTB | HEGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.47 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 4.10 | -1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.32 | 16.25 | -6.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTB | HEGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 2.59 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.97 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 1.06 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
MSTB vs. HEGD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTB drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, which is greater than HEGD's maximum drawdown of -14.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTB and HEGD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTB | HEGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.64% | -14.56% | -11.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -4.39% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.81% | -8.14% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.64% | -14.56% | -11.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -0.63% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -3.66% | -3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 1.10% | +1.09% |
Volatility
MSTB vs. HEGD - Volatility Comparison
LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) at 2.34%. This indicates that MSTB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTB | HEGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.56% | 2.34% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.43% | 4.95% | +2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.21% | 6.96% | +3.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 9.40% | +4.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.84% | 9.35% | +4.49% |
MSTB vs. HEGD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTB has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HEGD's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTB vs. HEGD - Dividend Comparison
MSTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, more than HEGD's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEGD Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF | 0.34% | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.39% | 0.87% | 0.31% | 0.00% |
MSTB LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF | 0.38% | 0.41% | 0.95% | 0.16% | 1.34% | 2.20% | 1.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTB and HEGD have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTB has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to HEGD (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTB dropped -25.64% vs HEGD's -14.56%.
On 5-year performance, HEGD leads with 9.03% vs 8.55% for MSTB. On fees, HEGD is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, HEGD has been the lower-risk option at 2.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HEGD has performed better with a 9.03% return vs 8.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HEGD is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 1.40% for MSTB.
MSTB has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.34% for HEGD.
MSTB tracks S&P 500® Index, while HEGD tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Little Harbor Advisors and Swan. Their fees differ too: 1.40% for MSTB and 0.88% for HEGD.
HEGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTB and HEGD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer