PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MST vs. MSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MST vs. MSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF (MST) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MST achieves a -59.06% return, which is significantly higher than MSTX's -66.03% return.


MST

1D
-7.02%
1M
-54.05%
YTD
-59.06%
6M
-64.02%
1Y
-94.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTX

1D
-7.56%
1M
-57.23%
YTD
-66.03%
6M
-71.32%
1Y
-96.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MST vs. MSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MST and MSTX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025

0.99

The correlation between MST and MSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MST vs. MSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MST
MST Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MST Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MST Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MST Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MST Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTX
MSTX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MST vs. MSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF (MST) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSTMSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

0.78

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

-0.99

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.25

-1.23

-0.02

MST vs. MSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MST Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is comparable to the MSTX Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MST and MSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MST vs. MSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MST drawdown since its inception was -95.63%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTX drawdown of -98.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MST and MSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTMSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.63%

-98.95%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-95.63%

-97.35%

+1.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.63%

-98.95%

+3.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.27%

-70.48%

+7.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

74.98%

77.91%

-2.93%

Volatility

MST vs. MSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF (MST) is 40.57%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) has a volatility of 44.87%. This indicates that MST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTMSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

40.57%

44.87%

-4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

103.31%

114.67%

-11.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

129.40%

143.23%

-13.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

124.46%

167.19%

-42.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

124.46%

167.19%

-42.73%

MST vs. MSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MST has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTX's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

MST vs. MSTX - Dividend Comparison

MST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 997.24%, while MSTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
MST
Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF
997.24%381.22%0.00%
MSTX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%41.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, MST and MSTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MSTX has higher volatility (44.87%) compared to MST (40.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MST dropped -95.63% vs MSTX's -98.95%.

On 1-year performance, MST leads with -94.08% vs -96.17% for MSTX. On fees, MSTX is cheaper at 1.29% per year. On volatility, MST has been the lower-risk option at 40.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MST has performed better with a -94.08% return vs -96.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSTX is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for MST.

MST has the higher dividend yield at 997.24%, compared with 0.00% for MSTX.

MST is categorized as Derivative Income, while MSTX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for MST and 1.29% for MSTX.

MSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.67 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MST and MSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer