MST vs. ARMW
MST (Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MST charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.
Performance
MST vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MST achieves a -46.90% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 363.23% return.
MST
- 1D
- -14.62%
- 1M
- -51.85%
- YTD
- -46.90%
- 6M
- -62.90%
- 1Y
- -92.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMW
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- 128.75%
- YTD
- 363.23%
- 6M
- 245.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MST vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MST Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF | -46.90% | -70.82% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 363.23% | -40.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between MST and ARMW is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MST vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank
MST
ARMW
MST vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF (MST) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MST | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MST | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.74 | 4.96 | -5.70 |
Drawdowns
MST vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MST drawdown since its inception was -94.99%, which is greater than ARMW's maximum drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MST and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MST | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.99% | -48.47% | -46.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -94.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.34% | 0.00% | -94.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.22% | -26.55% | -35.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 72.32% | — | — |
Volatility
MST vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MST | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.73% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 101.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 126.60% | 88.46% | +38.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 123.87% | 88.46% | +35.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 123.87% | 88.46% | +35.41% |
MST vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
MST has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
MST vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
MST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 891.75%, more than ARMW's 15.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 15.20% | 16.38% |
MST Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF | 891.75% | 381.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MST and ARMW have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for MST.
MST has the higher dividend yield at 891.75%, compared with 15.20% for ARMW.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for MST and 0.99% for ARMW.
Find the right allocation for MST and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer