MSST vs. COMB
MSST (YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF) and COMB (GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSST is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while COMB is a Commodities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. MSST charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for COMB.
Performance
MSST vs. COMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSST achieves a -33.85% return, which is significantly lower than COMB's 13.96% return.
MSST
- 1D
- 6.17%
- 1M
- -25.86%
- 6M
- -33.85%
- YTD
- -33.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMB
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -10.10%
- 6M
- 13.96%
- YTD
- 13.96%
- 1Y
- 22.59%
- 3Y*
- 11.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- —
MSST vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSST YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF | -33.85% | -24.58% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 13.96% | 1.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSST and COMB is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSST vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank
MSST
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
COMB
MSST vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (MSST) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSST | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.53 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.54 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSST vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSST drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than COMB's maximum drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSST and COMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSST | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.68% | -33.50% | -25.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.11% | -14.04% | -36.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.55% | -12.05% | -13.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.09% | — |
Volatility
MSST vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSST | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.61% | 17.29% | +58.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.61% | 16.71% | +58.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.61% | 15.14% | +60.47% |
MSST vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSST has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSST vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison
MSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.05%, more than COMB's 7.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.94% | 9.05% | 2.48% | 6.57% | 30.85% | 15.83% | 0.07% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.20% |
MSST YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF | 24.05% | 2.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSST and COMB have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COMB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COMB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSST.
MSST has the higher dividend yield at 24.05%, compared with 7.94% for COMB.
MSST is categorized as Derivative Income, while COMB is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSST and 0.25% for COMB.
Find the right allocation for MSST and COMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer