MSSS vs. RSHO
MSSS (Monarch Select Subsector ETF) and RSHO (Tema American Reshoring ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. MSSS is passively managed, while RSHO is actively managed. Over the past year, MSSS returned 19.87% vs 57.71% for RSHO. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSSS charges 1.43%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RSHO.
Performance
MSSS vs. RSHO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSSS achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly lower than RSHO's 33.69% return.
MSSS
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 4.26%
- YTD
- 12.62%
- 6M
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- 19.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSHO
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 33.69%
- 6M
- 33.85%
- 1Y
- 57.71%
- 3Y*
- 31.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSSS vs. RSHO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSSS Monarch Select Subsector ETF | 12.62% | 10.31% | 9.27% |
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF | 33.69% | 19.23% | 7.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSSS and RSHO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024 | 0.73 |
The correlation between MSSS and RSHO shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSSS vs. RSHO — Risk / Return Rank
MSSS
RSHO
MSSS vs. RSHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Select Subsector ETF (MSSS) and Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSSS | RSHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.52 | 2.44 | -0.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.27 | 3.28 | -1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.40 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 3.96 | -2.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.71 | 15.16 | -7.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSSS | RSHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 2.44 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 1.48 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
MSSS vs. RSHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSSS drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, smaller than the maximum RSHO drawdown of -27.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSSS and RSHO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSSS | RSHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.14% | -27.31% | +8.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.18% | -14.64% | +4.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | 0.00% | -1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -4.32% | +1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 3.82% | -1.24% |
Volatility
MSSS vs. RSHO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Monarch Select Subsector ETF (MSSS) is 3.13%, while Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) has a volatility of 9.22%. This indicates that MSSS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSSS | RSHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 9.22% | -6.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.81% | 20.09% | -10.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.11% | 23.74% | -10.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 22.55% | -6.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 22.55% | -6.51% |
MSSS vs. RSHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSSS has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than RSHO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSSS vs. RSHO - Dividend Comparison
MSSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, more than RSHO's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSSS Monarch Select Subsector ETF | 0.34% | 0.21% | 0.42% | 0.00% |
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.26% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSSS and RSHO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSHO has higher volatility (9.22%) compared to MSSS (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSSS dropped -19.14% vs RSHO's -27.31%.
On 1-year performance, RSHO leads with 57.71% vs 19.87% for MSSS. On fees, RSHO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, MSSS has been the lower-risk option at 3.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RSHO has performed better with a 57.71% return vs 19.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSHO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.43% for MSSS.
MSSS has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.22% for RSHO.
They also come from different issuers: Monarch and Tema. Their fees differ too: 1.43% for MSSS and 0.75% for RSHO.
RSHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSSS and RSHO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer