MSSMX vs. MGKQX
MSSMX (Morgan Stanley Institutional Inception Fund Class A) and MGKQX (Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio) are both mutual funds - MSSMX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Morgan Stanley, while MGKQX is a Global Equities fund managed by Morgan Stanley. Over the past 5 years, MSSMX returned -8.92%/yr vs 3.35%/yr for MGKQX. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MSSMX charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MGKQX.
Performance
MSSMX vs. MGKQX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSSMX achieves a 2.93% return, which is significantly higher than MGKQX's 1.16% return.
MSSMX
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- 6M
- 7.61%
- YTD
- 2.93%
- 1Y
- -0.27%
- 3Y*
- 9.66%
- 5Y*
- -8.92%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.62%
MGKQX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- -0.73%
- YTD
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- -14.15%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.35%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MSSMX vs. MGKQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSSMX Morgan Stanley Institutional Inception Fund Class A | 2.93% | 0.76% | 29.15% | 54.22% | -59.57% | -4.29% | 149.49% | 32.67% |
MGKQX Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio | 1.16% | 5.52% | 10.81% | 20.89% | -19.81% | 19.55% | 27.09% | 6.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSSMX and MGKQX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2019 | 0.75 |
The correlation between MSSMX and MGKQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSSMX vs. MGKQX — Risk / Return Rank
MSSMX
MGKQX
MSSMX vs. MGKQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Inception Fund Class A (MSSMX) and Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio (MGKQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSSMX | MGKQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.90 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | -0.59 | +0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.20 | -0.96 | +0.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSSMX vs. MGKQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSSMX drawdown since its inception was -76.24%, which is greater than MGKQX's maximum drawdown of -33.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSSMX and MGKQX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSSMX | MGKQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.24% | -33.07% | -43.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.92% | -25.97% | -6.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.92% | -25.97% | -6.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.12% | -30.96% | -40.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.60% | -19.64% | -28.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.72% | -8.81% | -15.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.49% | 15.99% | +0.50% |
Volatility
MSSMX vs. MGKQX - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Institutional Inception Fund Class A (MSSMX) has a higher volatility of 8.53% compared to Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio (MGKQX) at 4.39%. This indicates that MSSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGKQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSSMX | MGKQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.53% | 4.39% | +4.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.96% | 15.01% | +8.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.29% | 26.19% | +5.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.12% | 23.95% | +14.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.42% | 23.66% | +10.76% |
MSSMX vs. MGKQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSSMX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MGKQX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSSMX vs. MGKQX - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSSMX nor MGKQX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGKQX Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 21.29% | 5.29% | 1.80% | 16.33% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSSMX Morgan Stanley Institutional Inception Fund Class A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 36.28% | 13.10% | 45.60% | 18.04% | 57.39% | 3.76% | 9.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSSMX and MGKQX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSSMX has higher volatility (8.53%) compared to MGKQX (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSSMX dropped -76.24% vs MGKQX's -33.07%.
MSSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSSMX and MGKQX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer