PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MSRG.L vs. UC79.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MSRG.L vs. UC79.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MSRG.L (Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS DR ETF (C)) and UC79.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, from Amundi and UBS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MSRG.L returned 4.59%/yr vs 10.60%/yr for UC79.L. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MSRG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for UC79.L.

Performance

MSRG.L vs. UC79.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS DR ETF (C) (MSRG.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSRG.L achieves a 18.41% return, which is significantly lower than UC79.L's 35.46% return.

MSRG.L

1D
0.42%
1M
6.48%
YTD
18.41%
6M
19.51%
1Y
39.46%
3Y*
13.66%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
—

UC79.L

1D
-0.83%
1M
13.43%
YTD
35.46%
6M
38.06%
1Y
69.37%
3Y*
25.05%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
11.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSRG.L vs. UC79.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MSRG.L
Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS DR ETF (C)		18.41%19.09%6.13%-4.72%-8.13%-0.54%13.46%2.05%
UC79.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		35.46%26.95%10.88%1.14%-11.74%0.32%13.27%2.16%

Correlation

The correlation between MSRG.L and UC79.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019

0.95

The correlation between MSRG.L and UC79.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

MSRG.L vs. UC79.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MSRG.L
UC79.L

Technology

40.8%
38.0%

Financial Services

17.8%
22.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
11.0%

Industrials

8.3%
8.3%

Healthcare

5.2%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
2.8%

Communication Services

3.5%
8.0%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.3%

Utilities

3.1%
1.0%

Real Estate

2.9%
1.3%

Energy

-

0.2%

Technology

MSRG.L
40.8%
UC79.L
38.0%

Financial Services

MSRG.L
17.8%
UC79.L
22.6%

Consumer Cyclical

MSRG.L
10.1%
UC79.L
11.0%

Industrials

MSRG.L
8.3%
UC79.L
8.3%

Healthcare

MSRG.L
5.2%
UC79.L
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

MSRG.L
5.0%
UC79.L
2.8%

Communication Services

MSRG.L
3.5%
UC79.L
8.0%

Basic Materials

MSRG.L
3.2%
UC79.L
3.3%

Utilities

MSRG.L
3.1%
UC79.L
1.0%

Real Estate

MSRG.L
2.9%
UC79.L
1.3%

Energy

MSRG.L

-

UC79.L
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS DR ETF (C)

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis

Often compared with MSRG.L:
MSRG.L vs. GLDMSRG.L vs. EXCS.LMSRG.L vs. 100D.LMSRG.L vs. E127.LMSRG.L vs. PRAM.LMSRG.L vs. 500G.LMSRG.L vs. BNKE.L
Often compared with UC79.L:
UC79.L vs. HMEF.LUC79.L vs. EMV.LUC79.L vs. COPPUC79.L vs. V3AB.LUC79.L vs. HDEM.LUC79.L vs. 5ESG.LUC79.L vs. FLXE.L

Return for Risk

MSRG.L vs. UC79.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MSRG.L
MSRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
MSRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
MSRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
UC79.L
UC79.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
UC79.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC79.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC79.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
UC79.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC79.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSRG.L vs. UC79.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS DR ETF (C) (MSRG.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MSRG.LUC79.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.66
1.55

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.54
2.38

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.61

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

2.66

+1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.13

4.80

+8.33

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSRG.L vs. UC79.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSRG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the UC79.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSRG.L and UC79.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MSRG.LUC79.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

1.55

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.42

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.44

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.15

+0.18

Drawdowns

MSRG.L vs. UC79.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSRG.L drawdown since its inception was -30.52%, smaller than the maximum UC79.L drawdown of -53.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSRG.L and UC79.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MSRG.LUC79.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.52%

-53.04%

+22.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.98%

-25.91%

+15.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.35%

-25.91%

+7.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.21%

-25.91%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-39.46%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.83%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.32%

-21.80%

+9.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

14.42%

-11.30%

Volatility

MSRG.L vs. UC79.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS DR ETF (C) (MSRG.L) is 5.76%, while UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L) has a volatility of 8.44%. This indicates that MSRG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC79.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MSRG.LUC79.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

8.44%

-2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.55%

15.09%

-2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.39%

44.56%

-29.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.27%

24.98%

-8.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.98%

25.01%

-6.03%

MSRG.L vs. UC79.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSRG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than UC79.L's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MSRG.L vs. UC79.L - Dividend Comparison

MSRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC79.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSRG.L
Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS DR ETF (C)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC79.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		1.57%2.14%1.79%2.38%2.06%1.35%1.81%2.11%2.11%1.97%2.15%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

MSRG.L and UC79.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MSRG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSRG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for UC79.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MSRG.L and 0.27% for UC79.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSRG.L and UC79.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer