PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSOS vs. TCNNF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSOS vs. TCNNF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) and Trulieve Cannabis Corp (TCNNF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOS achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly higher than TCNNF's -0.92% return.


MSOS

1D
-6.14%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
0.42%
6M
28.46%
1Y
99.16%
3Y*
-4.01%
5Y*
-35.03%
10Y*

TCNNF

1D
-7.62%
1M
-6.11%
YTD
-0.92%
6M
44.22%
1Y
116.14%
3Y*
30.55%
5Y*
-25.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOS vs. TCNNF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MSOS
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
0.42%23.88%-45.65%0.29%-72.68%-29.69%47.95%
TCNNF
Trulieve Cannabis Corp
-0.92%67.65%-0.51%-31.18%-70.90%-17.74%49.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MSOS and TCNNF is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020

0.83

The correlation between MSOS and TCNNF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSOS vs. TCNNF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSOS
MSOS Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MSOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSOS Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MSOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSOS Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

TCNNF
TCNNF Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TCNNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCNNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCNNF Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
TCNNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCNNF Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOS vs. TCNNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) and Trulieve Cannabis Corp (TCNNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSOSTCNNFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

0.97

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.04

2.33

-0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.26

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

2.15

-0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.58

4.27

-0.69

MSOS vs. TCNNF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSOS Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the TCNNF Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSOS and TCNNF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSOSTCNNFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

0.97

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

-0.30

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.34

-0.03

-0.31

Drawdowns

MSOS vs. TCNNF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOS drawdown since its inception was -96.25%, roughly equal to the maximum TCNNF drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOS and TCNNF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSOSTCNNFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.25%

-93.88%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.91%

-54.42%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-81.71%

-77.52%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.99%

-91.77%

-3.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.37%

-83.69%

-7.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.71%

-61.17%

-10.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.78%

27.30%

+0.48%

Volatility

MSOS vs. TCNNF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) is 20.45%, while Trulieve Cannabis Corp (TCNNF) has a volatility of 28.96%. This indicates that MSOS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCNNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSOSTCNNFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.45%

28.96%

-8.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

80.61%

83.64%

-3.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

112.00%

120.71%

-8.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.81%

87.79%

-9.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.04%

81.83%

-7.79%

Dividends

MSOS vs. TCNNF - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSOS nor TCNNF has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MSOS
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.27%
TCNNF
Trulieve Cannabis Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MSOS and TCNNF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TCNNF has higher volatility (28.96%) compared to MSOS (20.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSOS dropped -96.25% vs TCNNF's -93.88%.

TCNNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSOS and TCNNF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer