PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSOS vs. HSMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSOS vs. HSMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOS achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than HSMV's 3.11% return.


MSOS

1D
-6.14%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
0.42%
6M
28.46%
1Y
99.16%
3Y*
-4.01%
5Y*
-35.03%
10Y*

HSMV

1D
-0.50%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
3.11%
6M
3.06%
1Y
4.19%
3Y*
8.36%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOS vs. HSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MSOS
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
0.42%23.88%-45.65%0.29%-72.68%-29.69%47.95%
HSMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF
3.11%1.57%13.17%5.01%-9.44%23.72%10.04%

Correlation

The correlation between MSOS and HSMV is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020

0.25

The correlation between MSOS and HSMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MSOS vs. HSMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSOS
HSMV

Real Estate

50.2%
23.8%

Industrials

29.6%
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

17.8%
7.8%

Healthcare

2.5%
4.9%

Basic Materials

-

5.4%

Communication Services

-

2.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.9%

Energy

-

2.8%

Financial Services

-

16.6%

Technology

-

1.7%

Utilities

-

11.9%

Real Estate

MSOS
50.2%
HSMV
23.8%

Industrials

MSOS
29.6%
HSMV
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MSOS
17.8%
HSMV
7.8%

Healthcare

MSOS
2.5%
HSMV
4.9%

Basic Materials

MSOS

-

HSMV
5.4%

Communication Services

MSOS

-

HSMV
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

MSOS

-

HSMV
7.9%

Energy

MSOS

-

HSMV
2.8%

Financial Services

MSOS

-

HSMV
16.6%

Technology

MSOS

-

HSMV
1.7%

Utilities

MSOS

-

HSMV
11.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSOS vs. HSMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSOS
MSOS Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MSOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSOS Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MSOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSOS Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

HSMV
HSMV Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
HSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
HSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOS vs. HSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSOSHSMVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

0.41

+0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.04

0.68

+1.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.07

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

0.54

+1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.58

1.62

+1.96

MSOS vs. HSMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSOS Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the HSMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSOS and HSMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSOSHSMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

0.41

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

0.25

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.34

0.67

-1.01

Drawdowns

MSOS vs. HSMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOS drawdown since its inception was -96.25%, which is greater than HSMV's maximum drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOS and HSMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSOSHSMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.25%

-19.16%

-77.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.91%

-7.83%

-45.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-81.71%

-15.45%

-66.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.99%

-19.16%

-75.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.37%

-4.36%

-87.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.71%

-5.62%

-66.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.78%

2.59%

+25.19%

Volatility

MSOS vs. HSMV - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) has a higher volatility of 20.45% compared to First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) at 2.85%. This indicates that MSOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSOSHSMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.45%

2.85%

+17.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

80.61%

7.28%

+73.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

112.00%

10.37%

+101.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.81%

15.00%

+62.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.04%

16.06%

+57.98%

MSOS vs. HSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSOS has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than HSMV's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSOS vs. HSMV - Dividend Comparison

MSOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
HSMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF
2.00%2.01%1.43%1.43%1.26%0.76%0.80%
MSOS
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.27%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSOS and HSMV have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSOS has higher volatility (20.45%) compared to HSMV (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSOS dropped -96.25% vs HSMV's -19.16%.

On 5-year performance, HSMV leads with 3.69% vs -35.03% for MSOS. On fees, MSOS is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, HSMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HSMV has performed better with a 3.69% return vs -35.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSOS is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HSMV.

HSMV has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.00% for MSOS.

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for MSOS and 0.80% for HSMV.

MSOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSOS and HSMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer