MSOS vs. FESM
MSOS (AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF) and FESM (Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSOS returned 99.16% vs 46.73% for FESM. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSOS charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for FESM.
Performance
MSOS vs. FESM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSOS achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than FESM's 19.64% return.
MSOS
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 28.46%
- 1Y
- 99.16%
- 3Y*
- -4.01%
- 5Y*
- -35.03%
- 10Y*
- —
FESM
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- YTD
- 19.64%
- 6M
- 19.11%
- 1Y
- 46.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSOS vs. FESM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSOS AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF | 0.42% | 23.88% | -45.65% | 5.57% |
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 19.64% | 17.88% | 16.22% | 12.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSOS and FESM is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023 | 0.24 |
MSOS vs. FESM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MSOS
FESM
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
MSOS
FESM
Industrials
MSOS
FESM
Consumer Cyclical
MSOS
FESM
Healthcare
MSOS
FESM
Basic Materials
MSOS
-
FESM
Communication Services
MSOS
-
FESM
Consumer Defensive
MSOS
-
FESM
Energy
MSOS
-
FESM
Financial Services
MSOS
-
FESM
Technology
MSOS
-
FESM
Utilities
MSOS
-
FESM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSOS vs. FESM — Risk / Return Rank
MSOS
FESM
MSOS vs. FESM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) and Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSOS | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 2.48 | -1.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.04 | 3.34 | -1.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.41 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 4.61 | -2.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.58 | 16.60 | -13.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSOS | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 2.48 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.34 | 1.29 | -1.63 |
Drawdowns
MSOS vs. FESM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSOS drawdown since its inception was -96.25%, which is greater than FESM's maximum drawdown of -26.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOS and FESM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSOS | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.25% | -26.93% | -69.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.91% | -10.18% | -42.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.37% | -1.59% | -89.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.71% | -4.79% | -66.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.78% | 2.82% | +24.96% |
Volatility
MSOS vs. FESM - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) has a higher volatility of 20.45% compared to Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) at 5.64%. This indicates that MSOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FESM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSOS | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.45% | 5.64% | +14.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 80.61% | 13.32% | +67.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 112.00% | 18.98% | +93.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.81% | 21.26% | +56.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.04% | 21.26% | +52.78% |
MSOS vs. FESM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSOS has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FESM's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSOS vs. FESM - Dividend Comparison
MSOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FESM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.08% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSOS AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSOS and FESM have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSOS has higher volatility (20.45%) compared to FESM (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSOS dropped -96.25% vs FESM's -26.93%.
On 1-year performance, MSOS leads with 99.16% vs 46.73% for FESM. On fees, FESM is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, FESM has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSOS has performed better with a 99.16% return vs 46.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FESM is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for MSOS.
FESM has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for MSOS.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for MSOS and 0.28% for FESM.
FESM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSOS and FESM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer