MSOO vs. XBJL

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

MSOO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF) and XBJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSOO charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XBJL.

Performance

MSOO vs. XBJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOO achieves a -26.25% return, which is significantly lower than XBJL's 4.75% return.

MSOO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: -33.94%
• YTD: -26.25%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XBJL

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.43%
• 6M: 4.31%
• YTD: 4.75%
• 1Y: 10.66%
• 3Y*: 11.21%
• 5Y*: 9.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOO vs. XBJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF	-26.25%	-61.39%
XBJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July	4.75%	3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between MSOO and XBJL is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

MSOO vs. XBJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSOO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XBJL

XBJL Risk / Return Rank: 86
XBJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
XBJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
XBJL Omega Ratio Rank: 91
XBJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
XBJL Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOO vs. XBJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSOO	XBJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.12	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.26	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.46	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.24	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	18.26	—

Drawdowns

MSOO vs. XBJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOO drawdown since its inception was -73.17%, which is greater than XBJL's maximum drawdown of -11.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOO and XBJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSOO	XBJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.17%	-11.78%	-61.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.30%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.74%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-11.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.52%	-0.28%	-71.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.93%	-1.60%	-49.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.59%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSOO	XBJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.02%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.75%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.69%	5.07%	+61.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.69%	9.91%	+56.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.69%	9.88%	+56.81%

MSOO vs. XBJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSOO has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than XBJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSOO vs. XBJL - Dividend Comparison

MSOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, while XBJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
MSOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF	2.20%	1.63%
XBJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSOO and XBJL in my portfolio?

MSOO and XBJL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSOO or XBJL?

On fees, MSOO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSOO or XBJL?

MSOO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XBJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSOO or XBJL?

MSOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 0.00% for XBJL.

What is the main difference between MSOO and XBJL?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for MSOO and 0.79% for XBJL.