MSOO vs. CBXA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MSOO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF) and CBXA (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. MSOO is actively managed, while CBXA is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MSOO charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBXA.

Performance

MSOO vs. CBXA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBXA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOO achieves a -23.81% return, which is significantly lower than CBXA's -20.06% return.

MSOO

• 1D: -6.75%
• 1M: -28.26%
• YTD: -23.81%
• 6M: -38.09%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBXA

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: -5.65%
• YTD: -20.06%
• 6M: -21.86%
• 1Y: -21.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOO vs. CBXA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF	-23.81%	-60.78%
CBXA Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	-20.06%	-7.66%

Correlation

The correlation between MSOO and CBXA is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025	0.84

Return for Risk

MSOO vs. CBXA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBXA

CBXA Risk / Return Rank: 1
CBXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
CBXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CBXA Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CBXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CBXA Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOO vs. CBXA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBXA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSOO	CBXA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-1.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.13	-0.63	-0.49

Drawdowns

MSOO vs. CBXA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOO drawdown since its inception was -72.39%, which is greater than CBXA's maximum drawdown of -27.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOO and CBXA.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSOO	CBXA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.39%	-27.22%	-45.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-27.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.12%	-27.22%	-42.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.41%	-8.69%	-38.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	14.07%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSOO	CBXA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.81%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.53%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.25%	17.98%	+51.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.25%	17.13%	+52.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.25%	17.13%	+52.12%

MSOO vs. CBXA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSOO has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than CBXA's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSOO vs. CBXA - Dividend Comparison

MSOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than CBXA's 2.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CBXA Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	2.47%	1.97%
MSOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF	2.13%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSOO and CBXA in my portfolio?

MSOO and CBXA have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSOO or CBXA?

On fees, CBXA is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSOO or CBXA?

CBXA is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for MSOO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSOO or CBXA?

CBXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 2.13% for MSOO.

What is the main difference between MSOO and CBXA?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for MSOO and 0.69% for CBXA.