PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSNCX vs. MEIKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSNCX vs. MEIKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund (MSNCX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSNCX achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly lower than MEIKX's 4.52% return. Over the past 10 years, MSNCX has underperformed MEIKX with an annualized return of 1.81%, while MEIKX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.06% annualized return.


MSNCX

1D
0.18%
1M
0.93%
YTD
2.03%
6M
2.41%
1Y
8.08%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
0.65%
10Y*
1.81%

MEIKX

1D
0.60%
1M
0.43%
YTD
4.52%
6M
5.90%
1Y
13.08%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSNCX vs. MEIKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSNCX
MFS North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund
2.03%4.29%2.05%5.34%-10.23%2.17%3.81%7.09%0.70%4.36%
MEIKX
MFS Value Fund
4.52%13.37%11.98%8.32%-5.92%25.59%4.09%30.18%-9.81%17.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MSNCX and MEIKX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006

-0.10

The correlation between MSNCX and MEIKX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSNCX vs. MEIKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSNCX
MSNCX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
MSNCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSNCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSNCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MSNCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSNCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

MEIKX
MEIKX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MEIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MEIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSNCX vs. MEIKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund (MSNCX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSNCXMEIKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.51

1.29

+1.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.94

1.88

+2.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.23

+0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

1.98

+0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.04

6.87

+2.17

MSNCX vs. MEIKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSNCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the MEIKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSNCX and MEIKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSNCXMEIKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

1.29

+1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.57

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.61

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.40

+0.70

Drawdowns

MSNCX vs. MEIKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSNCX drawdown since its inception was -17.74%, smaller than the maximum MEIKX drawdown of -56.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSNCX and MEIKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSNCXMEIKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.74%

-56.81%

+39.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-6.76%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.16%

-13.15%

+5.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.71%

-17.50%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.71%

-36.68%

+20.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-1.80%

+1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.31%

-9.45%

+7.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

1.95%

-1.07%

Volatility

MSNCX vs. MEIKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund (MSNCX) is 1.28%, while MFS Value Fund (MEIKX) has a volatility of 2.35%. This indicates that MSNCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEIKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSNCXMEIKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

2.35%

-1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.40%

7.75%

-5.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.21%

10.37%

-7.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.48%

13.91%

-9.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.27%

16.55%

-12.28%

MSNCX vs. MEIKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSNCX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than MEIKX's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSNCX vs. MEIKX - Dividend Comparison

MSNCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than MEIKX's 9.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEIKX
MFS Value Fund
9.50%9.72%9.49%8.58%7.77%3.43%2.75%3.28%3.76%4.14%3.84%6.12%
MSNCX
MFS North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund
3.29%4.32%2.86%2.36%1.64%1.81%2.35%3.11%3.22%3.31%3.48%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSNCX and MEIKX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MEIKX has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to MSNCX (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSNCX dropped -17.74% vs MEIKX's -56.81%.

MSNCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSNCX and MEIKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer