PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSNCX vs. APUSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSNCX vs. APUSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund (MSNCX) and Cavanal Hill Ultra Short Tax-Free Income Fund (APUSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSNCX achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly higher than APUSX's 0.81% return.


MSNCX

1D
0.18%
1M
0.93%
YTD
2.03%
6M
2.41%
1Y
8.08%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
0.65%
10Y*
1.81%

APUSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.81%
6M
1.02%
1Y
2.47%
3Y*
3.37%
5Y*
2.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSNCX vs. APUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MSNCX
MFS North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund
2.03%4.29%2.05%5.34%-10.23%2.17%3.72%
APUSX
Cavanal Hill Ultra Short Tax-Free Income Fund
0.81%3.88%3.65%2.63%-0.18%-0.40%0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MSNCX and APUSX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.26

The correlation between MSNCX and APUSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSNCX vs. APUSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSNCX
MSNCX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
MSNCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSNCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSNCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MSNCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSNCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

APUSX
APUSX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
APUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
APUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
APUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
APUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSNCX vs. APUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund (MSNCX) and Cavanal Hill Ultra Short Tax-Free Income Fund (APUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSNCXAPUSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

5.06

-3.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

24.81

-22.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.04

68.37

-59.34

MSNCX vs. APUSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSNCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the APUSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSNCX and APUSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSNCXAPUSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

3.20

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

1.68

-1.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

1.45

-0.35

Drawdowns

MSNCX vs. APUSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSNCX drawdown since its inception was -17.74%, which is greater than APUSX's maximum drawdown of -1.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSNCX and APUSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSNCXAPUSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.74%

-1.64%

-16.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-0.10%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.16%

-1.00%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.71%

-1.35%

-14.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

0.00%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.31%

-0.29%

-2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.04%

+0.84%

Volatility

MSNCX vs. APUSX - Volatility Comparison

MFS North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund (MSNCX) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to Cavanal Hill Ultra Short Tax-Free Income Fund (APUSX) at 0.24%. This indicates that MSNCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSNCXAPUSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

0.24%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.40%

0.54%

+1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.21%

0.78%

+2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.48%

1.25%

+3.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.27%

1.13%

+3.14%

MSNCX vs. APUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSNCX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than APUSX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSNCX vs. APUSX - Dividend Comparison

MSNCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than APUSX's 2.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APUSX
Cavanal Hill Ultra Short Tax-Free Income Fund
2.44%3.69%3.68%1.69%0.33%0.00%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSNCX
MFS North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund
3.29%4.32%2.86%2.36%1.64%1.81%2.35%3.11%3.22%3.31%3.48%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSNCX and APUSX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSNCX has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to APUSX (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSNCX dropped -17.74% vs APUSX's -1.64%.

APUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSNCX and APUSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer