MSNCX vs. FMBIX
MSNCX (MFS North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund) and FMBIX (Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MSNCX charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for FMBIX.
Performance
MSNCX vs. FMBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MSNCX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 2.41%
- 1Y
- 8.08%
- 3Y*
- 3.82%
- 5Y*
- 0.65%
- 10Y*
- 1.81%
FMBIX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSNCX vs. FMBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSNCX MFS North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund | 2.03% | 4.29% | 2.05% | 5.34% | -10.23% | 2.17% | 3.81% | 2.07% |
FMBIX Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.60% | 1.32% | 5.89% | -10.00% | 1.14% | 3.10% | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSNCX and FMBIX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019 | 0.82 |
The correlation between MSNCX and FMBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (3 years) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSNCX vs. FMBIX — Risk / Return Rank
MSNCX
FMBIX
MSNCX vs. FMBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund (MSNCX) and Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund (FMBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSNCX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.51 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.94 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.04 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSNCX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | — | — |
Drawdowns
MSNCX vs. FMBIX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSNCX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.31% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | — | — |
Volatility
MSNCX vs. FMBIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSNCX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.40% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.21% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.48% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.27% | — | — |
MSNCX vs. FMBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSNCX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than FMBIX's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSNCX vs. FMBIX - Dividend Comparison
MSNCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, while FMBIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMBIX Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.60% | 2.29% | 1.17% | 1.28% | 1.59% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSNCX MFS North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund | 3.29% | 4.32% | 2.86% | 2.36% | 1.64% | 1.81% | 2.35% | 3.11% | 3.22% | 3.31% | 3.48% | 3.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSNCX and FMBIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MSNCX and FMBIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer