MSMLX vs. TEQLX
MSMLX (Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund) and TEQLX (TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 10 years, MSMLX returned 11.19%/yr vs 9.08%/yr for TEQLX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSMLX charges 1.37%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for TEQLX.
Performance
MSMLX vs. TEQLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MSMLX having a 21.51% return and TEQLX slightly lower at 20.73%. Over the past 10 years, MSMLX has outperformed TEQLX with an annualized return of 11.19%, while TEQLX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.08% annualized return.
MSMLX
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- 6M
- 17.42%
- YTD
- 21.51%
- 1Y
- 21.40%
- 3Y*
- 9.79%
- 5Y*
- 6.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.19%
TEQLX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- YTD
- 20.73%
- 1Y
- 37.51%
- 3Y*
- 20.01%
- 5Y*
- 6.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
MSMLX vs. TEQLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSMLX Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund | 21.51% | 13.50% | -6.10% | 20.04% | -16.78% | 26.40% | 43.69% | 17.38% | -17.80% | 30.43% |
TEQLX TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund | 20.73% | 34.10% | 6.71% | 9.23% | -20.22% | -3.07% | 17.67% | 18.59% | -14.60% | 37.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSMLX and TEQLX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2010 | 0.76 |
The correlation between MSMLX and TEQLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSMLX vs. TEQLX — Risk / Return Rank
MSMLX
TEQLX
MSMLX vs. TEQLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX) and TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSMLX | TEQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.33 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 2.85 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.40 | 9.78 | -4.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSMLX vs. TEQLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSMLX drawdown since its inception was -36.40%, smaller than the maximum TEQLX drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSMLX and TEQLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSMLX | TEQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.40% | -39.33% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.89% | -13.32% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.62% | -15.97% | -6.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.00% | -34.64% | +6.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.33% | -39.33% | +5.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.34% | -7.53% | +2.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -14.53% | +5.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 3.87% | +0.20% |
Volatility
MSMLX vs. TEQLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX) is 7.36%, while TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that MSMLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEQLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSMLX | TEQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.36% | 10.43% | -3.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.00% | 20.13% | -2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.27% | 22.01% | -1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 17.91% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 18.01% | -0.64% |
MSMLX vs. TEQLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSMLX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than TEQLX's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSMLX vs. TEQLX - Dividend Comparison
MSMLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than TEQLX's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSMLX Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund | 1.23% | 1.50% | 3.95% | 8.36% | 8.04% | 9.18% | 0.28% | 0.51% | 21.31% | 8.12% | 0.43% | 0.13% |
TEQLX TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund | 2.34% | 2.83% | 2.93% | 3.08% | 2.51% | 2.27% | 2.04% | 2.77% | 2.43% | 1.98% | 1.88% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSMLX and TEQLX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TEQLX has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to MSMLX (7.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSMLX dropped -36.40% vs TEQLX's -39.33%.
TEQLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSMLX and TEQLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer