PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSMLX vs. ESCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSMLX vs. ESCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund (ESCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSMLX achieves a 25.47% return, which is significantly higher than ESCIX's 8.91% return. Over the past 10 years, MSMLX has outperformed ESCIX with an annualized return of 11.73%, while ESCIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.82% annualized return.


MSMLX

1D
0.87%
1M
2.24%
YTD
25.47%
6M
24.22%
1Y
34.43%
3Y*
13.33%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
11.73%

ESCIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
8.91%
6M
10.18%
1Y
27.86%
3Y*
15.58%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*
9.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSMLX vs. ESCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSMLX
Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund
25.47%13.50%-6.10%20.04%-16.78%26.40%43.69%17.38%-17.80%30.43%
ESCIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund
8.91%26.07%3.55%19.64%-24.45%11.93%43.41%15.24%-22.01%28.57%

Correlation

The correlation between MSMLX and ESCIX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2011

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between MSMLX and ESCIX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSMLX vs. ESCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSMLX
MSMLX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MSMLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSMLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSMLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
MSMLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSMLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

ESCIX
ESCIX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ESCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ESCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSMLX vs. ESCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund (ESCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSMLXESCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.57

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

5.31

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.39

19.40

-10.02

MSMLX vs. ESCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSMLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the ESCIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSMLX and ESCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSMLXESCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

2.63

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.32

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.56

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.39

+0.27

Drawdowns

MSMLX vs. ESCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSMLX drawdown since its inception was -36.40%, smaller than the maximum ESCIX drawdown of -48.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSMLX and ESCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSMLXESCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.40%

-48.76%

+12.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.89%

-5.70%

-7.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.62%

-19.97%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.00%

-36.59%

+8.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.33%

-48.76%

+14.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-0.74%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.24%

-13.33%

+4.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

1.52%

+2.34%

Volatility

MSMLX vs. ESCIX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX) has a higher volatility of 7.17% compared to Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund (ESCIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that MSMLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSMLXESCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.17%

0.00%

+7.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.84%

7.42%

+8.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.81%

11.53%

+7.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.74%

15.66%

+2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

17.60%

-0.42%

MSMLX vs. ESCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSMLX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is lower than ESCIX's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSMLX vs. ESCIX - Dividend Comparison

MSMLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than ESCIX's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESCIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund
0.42%0.91%0.00%0.56%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.11%1.66%1.16%0.00%
MSMLX
Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund
1.19%1.50%3.95%8.36%8.04%9.18%0.28%0.51%21.31%8.12%0.43%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSMLX and ESCIX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSMLX has higher volatility (7.17%) compared to ESCIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSMLX dropped -36.40% vs ESCIX's -48.76%.

ESCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSMLX and ESCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer