PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSLC vs. TEXN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSLC vs. TEXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF (MSLC) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSLC achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly lower than TEXN's 20.05% return.


MSLC

1D
-1.16%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
6.31%
6M
5.41%
1Y
19.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TEXN

1D
-1.33%
1M
-2.29%
YTD
20.05%
6M
18.60%
1Y
30.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSLC vs. TEXN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSLC and TEXN is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.57

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSLC vs. TEXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSLC
MSLC Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MSLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSLC Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MSLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSLC Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

TEXN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSLC vs. TEXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF (MSLC) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSLCTEXNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.83

MSLC vs. TEXN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSLC vs. TEXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSLC drawdown since its inception was -17.86%, which is greater than TEXN's maximum drawdown of -6.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSLC and TEXN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSLCTEXNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.86%

-6.34%

-11.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.31%

-6.34%

-2.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.87%

-4.90%

+2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-1.24%

-1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

Volatility

MSLC vs. TEXN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSLCTEXNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.33%

14.50%

-2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.15%

14.50%

+2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.15%

14.50%

+2.65%

MSLC vs. TEXN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSLC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than TEXN's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSLC vs. TEXN - Dividend Comparison

MSLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than TEXN's 1.40% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSLC and TEXN have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On 1-year performance, TEXN leads with 30.05% vs 19.11% for MSLC. On fees, TEXN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TEXN has performed better with a 30.05% return vs 19.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TEXN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MSLC.

MSLC has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 1.40% for TEXN.

They also come from different issuers: Morgan Stanley and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MSLC and 0.20% for TEXN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSLC and TEXN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer