MSLC vs. EBI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MSLC (Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF) and EBI (Longview Advantage ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSLC returned 19.11% vs 30.46% for EBI. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MSLC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for EBI.

Performance

MSLC vs. EBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF (MSLC) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSLC achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly lower than EBI's 13.70% return.

MSLC

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: -1.23%
• YTD: 6.31%
• 6M: 5.41%
• 1Y: 19.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EBI

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 13.70%
• 6M: 12.56%
• 1Y: 30.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSLC vs. EBI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSLC Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF	6.31%	13.98%
EBI Longview Advantage ETF	13.70%	15.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MSLC and EBI is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025	0.92

The correlation between MSLC and EBI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MSLC vs. EBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSLC

MSLC Risk / Return Rank: 49
MSLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
MSLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
MSLC Omega Ratio Rank: 47
MSLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
MSLC Martin Ratio Rank: 55

EBI

EBI Risk / Return Rank: 84
EBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
EBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EBI Omega Ratio Rank: 81
EBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
EBI Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSLC vs. EBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF (MSLC) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSLC	EBI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	2.46	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	3.37	-1.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.43	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	4.32	-2.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.83	17.50	-8.67

MSLC vs. EBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the EBI Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSLC and EBI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSLC vs. EBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSLC drawdown since its inception was -17.86%, roughly equal to the maximum EBI drawdown of -17.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSLC and EBI.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSLC	EBI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.86%	-17.05%	-0.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.31%	-7.09%	-2.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.87%	-1.43%	-1.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.44%	-2.03%	-0.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.17%	1.75%	+0.42%

Volatility

MSLC vs. EBI - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF (MSLC) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Longview Advantage ETF (EBI) at 4.03%. This indicates that MSLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSLC	EBI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.59%	4.03%	+0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.66%	9.27%	+0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.33%	12.49%	-0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.15%	17.88%	-0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.15%	17.88%	-0.73%

MSLC vs. EBI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSLC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than EBI's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSLC vs. EBI - Dividend Comparison

MSLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than EBI's 0.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
EBI Longview Advantage ETF	0.92%	1.05%
MSLC Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF	2.02%	2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSLC and EBI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, MSLC and EBI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MSLC or EBI?

MSLC has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to EBI (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSLC dropped -17.86% vs EBI's -17.05%.

Which ETF is better, MSLC or EBI?

On 1-year performance, EBI leads with 30.46% vs 19.11% for MSLC. On fees, EBI is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, EBI has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSLC or EBI?

Over the 1-year period, EBI has performed better with a 30.46% return vs 19.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSLC or EBI?

EBI is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MSLC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSLC or EBI?

MSLC has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.92% for EBI.

What is the main difference between MSLC and EBI?

They also come from different issuers: Morgan Stanley and Longview. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MSLC and 0.24% for EBI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.