MSIQX vs. LIAGX
MSIQX (Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Equity Portfolio) and LIAGX (Lord Abbett International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, MSIQX returned -9.35%/yr vs 23.58%/yr for LIAGX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MSIQX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for LIAGX.
Performance
MSIQX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSIQX achieves a 5.09% return, which is significantly lower than LIAGX's 33.43% return.
MSIQX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 5.09%
- 6M
- 4.78%
- 1Y
- -38.85%
- 3Y*
- -9.35%
- 5Y*
- -6.94%
- 10Y*
- 1.28%
LIAGX
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 10.36%
- YTD
- 33.43%
- 6M
- 33.43%
- 1Y
- 47.63%
- 3Y*
- 23.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSIQX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSIQX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Equity Portfolio | 5.09% | -33.40% | 2.70% | 16.86% | -14.24% | -3.13% |
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund | 33.43% | 25.09% | 9.43% | 15.73% | -26.63% | 0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSIQX and LIAGX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | 0.88 |
The correlation between MSIQX and LIAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSIQX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank
MSIQX
LIAGX
MSIQX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Equity Portfolio (MSIQX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSIQX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.39 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 3.36 | -4.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 13.20 | -14.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSIQX vs. LIAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSIQX drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, which is greater than LIAGX's maximum drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSIQX and LIAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSIQX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.18% | -37.87% | -18.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.39% | -14.56% | -34.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.18% | -17.11% | -39.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.18% | -37.87% | -18.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.94% | 0.00% | -50.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.16% | -13.12% | +3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.81% | 3.70% | +28.11% |
Volatility
MSIQX vs. LIAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Equity Portfolio (MSIQX) is 4.81%, while Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a volatility of 10.79%. This indicates that MSIQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSIQX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 10.79% | -5.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.57% | 20.34% | -7.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.64% | 22.86% | +25.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.04% | 19.22% | +14.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.74% | 19.22% | +7.52% |
MSIQX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSIQX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSIQX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison
MSIQX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LIAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund | 0.28% | 0.38% | 0.48% | 0.71% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSIQX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Equity Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 40.18% | 4.40% | 7.56% | 10.56% | 1.36% | 10.14% | 14.89% | 1.91% | 1.07% | 2.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSIQX and LIAGX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIAGX has higher volatility (10.79%) compared to MSIQX (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSIQX dropped -56.18% vs LIAGX's -37.87%.
LIAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSIQX and LIAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer