MSIQX vs. TRLGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MSIQX (Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Equity Portfolio) and TRLGX (T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - MSIQX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while TRLGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 10 years, MSIQX returned 1.28%/yr vs 18.48%/yr for TRLGX. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSIQX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TRLGX.

Performance

MSIQX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Equity Portfolio (MSIQX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSIQX achieves a 5.09% return, which is significantly higher than TRLGX's -0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, MSIQX has underperformed TRLGX with an annualized return of 1.28%, while TRLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.48% annualized return.

MSIQX

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 5.09%
• 6M: 4.78%
• 1Y: -38.85%
• 3Y*: -9.35%
• 5Y*: -6.94%
• 10Y*: 1.28%

TRLGX

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: -2.62%
• YTD: -0.26%
• 6M: -1.17%
• 1Y: 14.05%
• 3Y*: 22.59%
• 5Y*: 10.25%
• 10Y*: 18.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSIQX vs. TRLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MSIQX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Equity Portfolio	5.09%	-33.40%	2.70%	16.86%	-14.24%	4.11%	11.43%	20.49%	-13.92%	25.18%
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund	-0.26%	17.51%	37.57%	46.22%	-35.26%	23.24%	39.57%	28.51%	4.35%	37.77%

Correlation

The correlation between MSIQX and TRLGX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2001	0.61

The correlation between MSIQX and TRLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MSIQX vs. TRLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSIQX

MSIQX Risk / Return Rank: 1
MSIQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
MSIQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
MSIQX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
MSIQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
MSIQX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

TRLGX

TRLGX Risk / Return Rank: 11
TRLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
TRLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
TRLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
TRLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
TRLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSIQX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Equity Portfolio (MSIQX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSIQX	TRLGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.80	0.92	-1.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.68	1.34	-2.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.76	1.17	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	0.83	-1.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	2.57	-3.78

MSIQX vs. TRLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSIQX Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the TRLGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSIQX and TRLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSIQX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSIQX drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, roughly equal to the maximum TRLGX drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSIQX and TRLGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSIQX	TRLGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.18%	-55.56%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.39%	-18.18%	-31.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.18%	-21.17%	-35.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.18%	-40.44%	-15.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.18%	-40.44%	-15.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.94%	-5.97%	-44.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.16%	-8.67%	-0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.81%	5.85%	+25.96%

Volatility

MSIQX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Equity Portfolio (MSIQX) is 4.81%, while T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that MSIQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSIQX	TRLGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.81%	6.43%	-1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.57%	13.44%	-0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.64%	16.52%	+32.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.04%	22.48%	+11.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.74%	21.83%	+4.91%

MSIQX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSIQX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSIQX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison

MSIQX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.73%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSIQX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Equity Portfolio	0.00%	0.00%	40.18%	4.40%	7.56%	10.56%	1.36%	10.14%	14.89%	1.91%	1.07%	2.89%
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund	13.73%	13.69%	9.80%	2.04%	3.88%	2.56%	0.42%	4.09%	7.93%	9.27%	1.64%	4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSIQX and TRLGX in my portfolio?

MSIQX and TRLGX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSIQX or TRLGX?

TRLGX has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to MSIQX (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSIQX dropped -56.18% vs TRLGX's -55.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.