MSHE.TO vs. HBIL.TO
MSHE.TO (Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) and HBIL.TO (Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged)) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSHE.TO returned -8.22% vs 2.87% for HBIL.TO. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. MSHE.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HBIL.TO.
Performance
MSHE.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSHE.TO achieves a -13.46% return, which is significantly lower than HBIL.TO's 0.59% return.
MSHE.TO
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- 6.93%
- YTD
- -13.46%
- 6M
- -13.17%
- 1Y
- -8.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBIL.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 2.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSHE.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSHE.TO Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | -13.46% | 8.80% | 3.91% |
HBIL.TO Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) | 0.59% | 3.05% | -1.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSHE.TO and HBIL.TO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2024 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSHE.TO vs. HBIL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
MSHE.TO
HBIL.TO
MSHE.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (MSHE.TO) and Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSHE.TO | HBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.34 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 3.03 | -3.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.45 | 9.74 | -10.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSHE.TO | HBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 | 1.74 | -2.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.64 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
MSHE.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.62%, which is greater than HBIL.TO's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSHE.TO and HBIL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSHE.TO | HBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.62% | -1.69% | -35.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.62% | -0.95% | -36.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.77% | -0.31% | -23.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | -0.48% | -10.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.36% | 0.30% | +18.06% |
Volatility
MSHE.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (MSHE.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO) at 0.62%. This indicates that MSHE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBIL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSHE.TO | HBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.24% | 0.62% | +10.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.57% | 1.24% | +23.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.13% | 1.66% | +25.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.27% | 2.03% | +26.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.27% | 2.03% | +26.24% |
MSHE.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSHE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HBIL.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSHE.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Dividend Comparison
MSHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.77%, more than HBIL.TO's 6.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HBIL.TO Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) | 6.52% | 7.49% | 2.58% |
MSHE.TO Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 21.77% | 17.17% | 5.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSHE.TO and HBIL.TO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HBIL.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HBIL.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MSHE.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Hamilton Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MSHE.TO and 0.35% for HBIL.TO.
Find the right allocation for MSHE.TO and HBIL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer