MSHE.TO vs. EQLI.TO
MSHE.TO (Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) and EQLI.TO (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSHE.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest, while EQLI.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. MSHE.TO is actively managed, while EQLI.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, MSHE.TO returned -8.22% vs 19.34% for EQLI.TO. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSHE.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for EQLI.TO.
Performance
MSHE.TO vs. EQLI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSHE.TO achieves a -13.46% return, which is significantly lower than EQLI.TO's 9.23% return.
MSHE.TO
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- 6.93%
- YTD
- -13.46%
- 6M
- -13.17%
- 1Y
- -8.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EQLI.TO
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 6M
- 8.05%
- 1Y
- 19.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSHE.TO vs. EQLI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSHE.TO Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | -13.46% | 8.80% | 5.80% |
EQLI.TO Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF | 9.23% | 6.40% | 7.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSHE.TO and EQLI.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSHE.TO vs. EQLI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
MSHE.TO
EQLI.TO
MSHE.TO vs. EQLI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (MSHE.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (EQLI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSHE.TO | EQLI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.38 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 3.56 | -3.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.45 | 13.79 | -14.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSHE.TO | EQLI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 | 2.15 | -2.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 1.09 | -1.10 |
Drawdowns
MSHE.TO vs. EQLI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.62%, which is greater than EQLI.TO's maximum drawdown of -15.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSHE.TO and EQLI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSHE.TO | EQLI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.62% | -15.57% | -22.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.62% | -5.45% | -32.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.77% | 0.00% | -23.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | -2.45% | -8.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.36% | 1.41% | +16.95% |
Volatility
MSHE.TO vs. EQLI.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (MSHE.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (EQLI.TO) at 1.88%. This indicates that MSHE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQLI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSHE.TO | EQLI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.24% | 1.88% | +9.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.57% | 6.82% | +17.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.13% | 9.08% | +18.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.27% | 12.11% | +16.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.27% | 12.11% | +16.16% |
MSHE.TO vs. EQLI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSHE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EQLI.TO's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSHE.TO vs. EQLI.TO - Dividend Comparison
MSHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.77%, more than EQLI.TO's 8.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EQLI.TO Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF | 8.29% | 8.74% | 3.00% |
MSHE.TO Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 21.77% | 17.17% | 5.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSHE.TO and EQLI.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EQLI.TO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EQLI.TO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MSHE.TO.
MSHE.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while EQLI.TO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MSHE.TO and 0.29% for EQLI.TO.
Find the right allocation for MSHE.TO and EQLI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer