MSFY vs. UTES

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

MSFY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF) and UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv, while UTES is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSFY returned -18.07% vs 8.95% for UTES. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSFY charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for UTES.

Performance

MSFY vs. UTES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFY achieves a -22.50% return, which is significantly lower than UTES's 0.26% return.

MSFY

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -5.08%
• YTD: -22.50%
• 6M: -21.30%
• 1Y: -18.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UTES

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: -0.82%
• YTD: 0.26%
• 6M: 0.49%
• 1Y: 8.95%
• 3Y*: 22.00%
• 5Y*: 15.32%
• 10Y*: 12.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFY vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF	-22.50%	14.11%	10.88%	2.57%
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF	0.26%	25.71%	45.35%	3.38%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFY and UTES is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2023	0.18

Return for Risk

MSFY vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFY

MSFY Risk / Return Rank: 4
MSFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MSFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
MSFY Omega Ratio Rank: 4
MSFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
MSFY Martin Ratio Rank: 4

UTES

UTES Risk / Return Rank: 16
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 15
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFY vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSFY	UTES	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.69	0.39	-1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.80	0.67	-1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.08	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.54	0.60	-1.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.16	1.32	-2.49

MSFY vs. UTES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFY Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the UTES Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFY and UTES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSFY vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFY drawdown since its inception was -34.21%, roughly equal to the maximum UTES drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFY and UTES.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFY	UTES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.21%	-35.39%	+1.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.21%	-13.88%	-20.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.62%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.40%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.39%	-9.10%	-19.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.38%	-5.53%	-1.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.96%	6.29%	+9.67%

Volatility

MSFY vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) has a higher volatility of 11.56% compared to Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) at 7.23%. This indicates that MSFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFY	UTES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.56%	7.23%	+4.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.20%	17.05%	+8.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.90%	21.32%	+5.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.33%	20.62%	+1.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.33%	20.17%	+2.16%

MSFY vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFY has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFY vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison

MSFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.99%, more than UTES's 1.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF	26.99%	18.56%	14.35%	1.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF	1.49%	1.42%	1.51%	2.44%	2.13%	1.94%	2.09%	1.84%	2.09%	3.44%	3.53%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFY and UTES in my portfolio?

MSFY and UTES have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSFY or UTES?

MSFY has higher volatility (11.56%) compared to UTES (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFY dropped -34.21% vs UTES's -35.39%.

Which ETF is better, MSFY or UTES?

On 1-year performance, UTES leads with 8.95% vs -18.07% for MSFY. On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, UTES has been the lower-risk option at 7.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSFY or UTES?

Over the 1-year period, UTES has performed better with a 8.95% return vs -18.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFY or UTES?

UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for MSFY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFY or UTES?

MSFY has the higher dividend yield at 26.99%, compared with 1.49% for UTES.

What is the main difference between MSFY and UTES?

MSFY is categorized as Derivative Income, while UTES is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for MSFY and 0.49% for UTES.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UTES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.39 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.