MSFY vs. NVDA
MSFY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. Over the past year, MSFY returned -7.25% vs 52.10% for NVDA. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MSFY vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFY achieves a -13.99% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 15.15% return.
MSFY
- 1D
- -3.43%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- YTD
- -13.99%
- 6M
- -12.67%
- 1Y
- -7.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDA
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- 8.20%
- YTD
- 15.15%
- 6M
- 19.59%
- 1Y
- 52.10%
- 3Y*
- 76.15%
- 5Y*
- 65.05%
- 10Y*
- 68.84%
MSFY vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF | -13.99% | 14.11% | 10.88% | 2.57% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 15.15% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 8.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFY and NVDA is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFY vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
MSFY
NVDA
MSFY vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFY | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.26 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 2.59 | -2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | 6.36 | -6.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFY | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 | 1.53 | -1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.63 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
MSFY vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFY drawdown since its inception was -34.21%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFY and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFY | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.21% | -89.72% | +55.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.21% | -20.21% | -14.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.53% | -8.90% | -11.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.20% | -36.21% | +29.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.40% | 8.21% | +7.19% |
Volatility
MSFY vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) is 10.84%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 12.53%. This indicates that MSFY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFY | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.84% | 12.53% | -1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.02% | 25.54% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.51% | 34.22% | -7.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.27% | 51.69% | -29.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.27% | 49.80% | -27.53% |
Dividends
MSFY vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
MSFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.31%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF | 24.31% | 18.56% | 14.35% | 1.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFY and NVDA have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDA has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to MSFY (10.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFY dropped -34.21% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFY and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer