MSFY vs. KYLD
MSFY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF) and KYLD (Kurv High Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Kurv. Both are actively managed. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 1.00% expense ratio.
Performance
MSFY vs. KYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFY achieves a -7.56% return, which is significantly lower than KYLD's 15.10% return.
MSFY
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 19.29%
- 6M
- 11.06%
- YTD
- -7.56%
- 1Y
- -12.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.86%
KYLD
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- -3.67%
- 6M
- 15.87%
- YTD
- 15.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $941.23K | $1.03M | $878.93K | |
| $332.29K | $251.71K | $274.77K |
MSFY vs. KYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF | -7.56% | -6.14% |
KYLD Kurv High Income ETF | 15.10% | -11.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFY and KYLD is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFY vs. KYLD — Risk / Return Rank
MSFY
KYLD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSFY vs. KYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) and Kurv High Income ETF (KYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFY | KYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFY vs. KYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFY drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, which is greater than KYLD's maximum drawdown of -21.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFY and KYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFY | KYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.65% | -21.14% | -14.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.60% | -6.74% | -7.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.44% | -8.03% | -0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.16% | — | — |
Volatility
MSFY vs. KYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFY | KYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.36% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.50% | 32.83% | -0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.57% | 32.83% | -8.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.57% | 32.83% | -8.26% |
MSFY vs. KYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MSFY and KYLD have an expense ratio of 1.00%.
Dividends
MSFY vs. KYLD - Dividend Comparison
MSFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.66%, more than KYLD's 21.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KYLD Kurv High Income ETF | 21.97% | 6.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF | 22.66% | 18.56% | 14.35% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFY and KYLD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.00% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSFY and KYLD have the same expense ratio: 1.00% per year.
MSFY has the higher dividend yield at 22.66%, compared with 21.97% for KYLD.
Find the right allocation for MSFY and KYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer