MSFY vs. IVVW
MSFY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF) and IVVW (iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. MSFY is actively managed, while IVVW is passively managed. Over the past year, MSFY returned -12.05% vs 19.14% for IVVW. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MSFY charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IVVW.
Performance
MSFY vs. IVVW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFY achieves a -7.56% return, which is significantly lower than IVVW's 8.65% return.
MSFY
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 19.29%
- 6M
- 11.06%
- YTD
- -7.56%
- 1Y
- -12.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.86%
IVVW
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- YTD
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- 19.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.92M | $2.07M | $2.67M | |
| $332.29K | $251.71K | $274.77K |
MSFY vs. IVVW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF | -7.56% | 14.11% | 0.29% |
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 8.65% | 11.71% | 12.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFY and IVVW is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2024 | 0.54 |
The correlation between MSFY and IVVW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFY vs. IVVW — Risk / Return Rank
MSFY
IVVW
MSFY vs. IVVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFY | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.47 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 3.31 | -3.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | 17.16 | -17.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFY vs. IVVW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFY drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, which is greater than IVVW's maximum drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFY and IVVW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFY | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.65% | -16.79% | -18.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.65% | -5.81% | -29.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.60% | 0.00% | -14.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.44% | -1.67% | -6.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.16% | 1.12% | +18.04% |
Volatility
MSFY vs. IVVW - Volatility Comparison
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) has a higher volatility of 14.28% compared to iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) at 3.01%. This indicates that MSFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFY | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.28% | 3.01% | +11.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.36% | 7.33% | +20.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.50% | 8.57% | +23.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.57% | 12.56% | +12.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.57% | 12.56% | +12.01% |
MSFY vs. IVVW - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFY has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVW's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFY vs. IVVW - Dividend Comparison
MSFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.66%, more than IVVW's 18.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 18.43% | 18.55% | 13.72% | 0.00% |
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF | 22.66% | 18.56% | 14.35% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFY and IVVW have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFY has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to IVVW (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFY dropped -35.65% vs IVVW's -16.79%.
On 1-year performance, IVVW leads with 19.14% vs -12.05% for MSFY. On fees, IVVW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IVVW has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IVVW has performed better with a 19.14% return vs -12.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVVW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for MSFY.
MSFY has the higher dividend yield at 22.66%, compared with 18.43% for IVVW.
They also come from different issuers: Kurv and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for MSFY and 0.25% for IVVW.
IVVW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFY and IVVW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer