PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFY vs. DRLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFY vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFY achieves a -13.99% return, which is significantly lower than DRLL's 31.26% return.


MSFY

1D
-3.43%
1M
4.37%
YTD
-13.99%
6M
-12.67%
1Y
-7.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DRLL

1D
1.47%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
31.26%
6M
27.14%
1Y
43.09%
3Y*
14.67%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFY vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MSFY
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF
-13.99%14.11%10.88%2.57%
DRLL
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
31.26%7.74%0.02%-1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFY and DRLL is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023

-0.02

The correlation between MSFY and DRLL shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFY vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFY
MSFY Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
MSFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFY Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

DRLL
DRLL Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DRLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRLL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DRLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRLL Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFY vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSFYDRLLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.32

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

3.11

-3.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.47

8.82

-9.29

MSFY vs. DRLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFY Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the DRLL Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFY and DRLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSFYDRLLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

1.94

-2.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.57

-0.37

Drawdowns

MSFY vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFY drawdown since its inception was -34.21%, which is greater than DRLL's maximum drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFY and DRLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFYDRLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.21%

-23.73%

-10.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.21%

-13.93%

-20.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.53%

-8.10%

-12.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

-8.02%

+0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.40%

4.90%

+10.50%

Volatility

MSFY vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) has a higher volatility of 10.84% compared to Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) at 9.15%. This indicates that MSFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFYDRLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.84%

9.15%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.02%

18.04%

+6.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.51%

22.34%

+4.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.27%

23.76%

-1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.27%

23.76%

-1.49%

MSFY vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFY has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFY vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison

MSFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.31%, more than DRLL's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DRLL
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
2.33%2.99%3.00%3.01%1.18%
MSFY
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF
24.31%18.56%14.35%1.94%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFY and DRLL have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFY has higher volatility (10.84%) compared to DRLL (9.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFY dropped -34.21% vs DRLL's -23.73%.

On 1-year performance, DRLL leads with 43.09% vs -7.25% for MSFY. On fees, DRLL is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, DRLL has been the lower-risk option at 9.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DRLL has performed better with a 43.09% return vs -7.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DRLL is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for MSFY.

MSFY has the higher dividend yield at 24.31%, compared with 2.33% for DRLL.

MSFY is categorized as Derivative Income, while DRLL is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Strive. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for MSFY and 0.41% for DRLL.

DRLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFY and DRLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer