MSFT vs. WPM.TO
MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) and WPM.TO (Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.) are both stocks. MSFT operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while WPM.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, MSFT returned 24.39%/yr vs 20.54%/yr for WPM.TO. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MSFT vs. WPM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MSFT is traded in USD, while WPM.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the WPM.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -18.85% return, which is significantly lower than WPM.TO's -1.10% return. Over the past 10 years, MSFT has outperformed WPM.TO with an annualized return of 24.39%, while WPM.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 20.54% annualized return.
MSFT
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -7.19%
- YTD
- -18.85%
- 6M
- -17.98%
- 1Y
- -17.07%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- 24.39%
WPM.TO
- 1D
- 3.11%
- 1M
- -10.99%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 6M
- -0.75%
- 1Y
- 27.62%
- 3Y*
- 38.75%
- 5Y*
- 20.54%
- 10Y*
- 20.54%
MSFT vs. WPM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -18.85% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 40.73% |
WPM.TO Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | -1.10% | 110.53% | 15.36% | 28.25% | -6.96% | 3.25% | 42.44% | 53.50% | -9.83% | 16.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFT and WPM.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
MSFT:
$2.91T
WPM.TO:
CA$73.85B
MSFT:
$16.79
WPM.TO:
$3.96
MSFT:
23.27
WPM.TO:
29.36
MSFT:
1.63
WPM.TO:
0.79
MSFT:
9.16
WPM.TO:
19.24
MSFT:
7.02
WPM.TO:
5.71
MSFT:
$318.27B
WPM.TO:
$2.74B
MSFT:
$217.41B
WPM.TO:
$2.12B
MSFT:
$200.96B
WPM.TO:
$2.37B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFT vs. WPM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
MSFT
WPM.TO
MSFT vs. WPM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFT | WPM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.15 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 0.86 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 2.46 | -3.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFT vs. WPM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, smaller than the maximum WPM.TO drawdown of -86.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and WPM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFT | WPM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.38% | -86.62% | +17.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.91% | -34.97% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.91% | -34.97% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.15% | -42.43% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.15% | -48.37% | +11.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.46% | -29.72% | +2.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.78% | -31.38% | +9.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.48% | 12.17% | +4.31% |
Volatility
MSFT vs. WPM.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is 10.52%, while Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM.TO) has a volatility of 17.83%. This indicates that MSFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WPM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFT | WPM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.52% | 17.83% | -7.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.31% | 38.50% | -16.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.42% | 45.47% | -20.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.66% | 34.10% | -7.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.06% | 35.73% | -8.67% |
Dividends
MSFT vs. WPM.TO - Dividend Comparison
MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than WPM.TO's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.91% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
WPM.TO Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | 0.62% | 0.57% | 1.05% | 1.25% | 1.40% | 1.05% | 1.08% | 1.24% | 1.75% | 1.54% | 1.06% | 1.48% |
Financials
MSFT vs. WPM.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Microsoft Corporation and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MSFT vs. WPM.TO - Profitability Comparison
MSFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.
WPM.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a gross profit of 687.49M and revenue of 886.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.5%.
MSFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
WPM.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported an operating income of 665.21M and revenue of 886.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 75.0%.
MSFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.
WPM.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a net income of 572.50M and revenue of 886.69M, resulting in a net margin of 64.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFT and WPM.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MSFT and WPM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer