PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFT vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSFT vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -18.85% return, which is significantly lower than T's -2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, MSFT has outperformed T with an annualized return of 24.39%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 3.33% annualized return.


MSFT

1D
0.10%
1M
-7.19%
YTD
-18.85%
6M
-17.98%
1Y
-17.07%
3Y*
6.16%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*
24.39%

T

1D
2.52%
1M
-1.87%
YTD
-2.96%
6M
-1.93%
1Y
-12.71%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
3.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFT vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-18.85%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%40.73%
T
AT&T Inc.
-2.96%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFT and T is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 1986

0.25

The correlation between MSFT and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MSFT:

$16.79

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

MSFT:

23.27

T:

7.74

PEG Ratio

MSFT:

1.63

T:

0.32

PS Ratio

MSFT:

9.16

T:

1.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSFT:

$318.27B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSFT:

$217.41B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

MSFT:

$200.96B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFT vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFT vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFTTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

0.92

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

-0.59

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

-1.22

+0.14

MSFT vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFT Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is comparable to the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFT and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFT vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFTTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.38%

-64.15%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.91%

-21.87%

-12.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.91%

-21.87%

-12.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.15%

-32.01%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.15%

-42.35%

+5.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.46%

-18.12%

-9.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.78%

-15.72%

-6.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.48%

10.64%

+5.84%

Volatility

MSFT vs. T - Volatility Comparison

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a higher volatility of 10.52% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 8.21%. This indicates that MSFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFTTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.52%

8.21%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.31%

17.80%

+4.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.42%

22.13%

+3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.66%

24.01%

+2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.06%

23.73%

+3.33%

Dividends

MSFT vs. T - Dividend Comparison

MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than T's 4.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.91%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.71%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

MSFT vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Microsoft Corporation and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
82.89B
33.47B
(MSFT) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFT and T have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFT has higher volatility (10.52%) compared to T (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFT dropped -69.38% vs T's -64.15%.

T currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.59 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFT and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer