MSFT vs. SLV
MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock, while SLV (iShares Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Over the past 10 years, MSFT returned 24.64%/yr vs 14.08%/yr for SLV. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MSFT vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -14.48% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's -4.41% return. Over the past 10 years, MSFT has outperformed SLV with an annualized return of 24.64%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively lower 14.08% annualized return.
MSFT
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- -14.48%
- 6M
- -15.77%
- 1Y
- -11.77%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- 11.09%
- 10Y*
- 24.64%
SLV
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -15.66%
- YTD
- -4.41%
- 6M
- 16.83%
- 1Y
- 88.38%
- 3Y*
- 40.36%
- 5Y*
- 19.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.08%
MSFT vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -14.48% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 40.73% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -4.41% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFT and SLV is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFT vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
MSFT
SLV
MSFT vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFT | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.30 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 2.09 | -2.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | 4.40 | -5.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFT | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | 1.50 | -1.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.53 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | 0.44 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.23 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
MSFT vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFT | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.38% | -76.28% | +6.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.91% | -42.45% | +8.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.91% | -42.45% | +8.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.15% | -42.45% | +5.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.15% | -42.81% | +5.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.56% | -41.69% | +18.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.78% | -44.67% | +22.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.13% | 20.15% | -4.02% |
Volatility
MSFT vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is 10.25%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.89%. This indicates that MSFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFT | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.25% | 16.89% | -6.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.36% | 58.88% | -36.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.31% | 59.53% | -34.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.64% | 36.33% | -9.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.06% | 31.92% | -4.86% |
Dividends
MSFT vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.86% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFT and SLV have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.89%) compared to MSFT (10.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFT dropped -69.38% vs SLV's -76.28%.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFT and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer