PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFT vs. DKS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSFT vs. DKS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -18.85% return, which is significantly lower than DKS's 12.99% return. Over the past 10 years, MSFT has outperformed DKS with an annualized return of 24.39%, while DKS has yielded a comparatively lower 21.90% annualized return.


MSFT

1D
0.10%
1M
-3.36%
YTD
-18.85%
6M
-17.98%
1Y
-17.75%
3Y*
6.16%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*
24.39%

DKS

1D
-0.77%
1M
3.55%
YTD
12.99%
6M
4.67%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
20.82%
10Y*
21.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFT vs. DKS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-18.85%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%40.73%
DKS
DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
12.99%-11.45%58.91%25.94%6.61%116.67%17.94%63.22%11.35%-44.79%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFT and DKS is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2002

0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between MSFT and DKS has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSFT:

$2.91T

DKS:

$19.98B

EPS

MSFT:

$16.79

DKS:

$3.67K

PE Ratio

MSFT:

23.27

DKS:

0.06

PS Ratio

MSFT:

9.16

DKS:

0.00

PB Ratio

MSFT:

7.02

DKS:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSFT:

$318.27B

DKS:

$5.18T

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSFT:

$217.41B

DKS:

$1.69T

EBITDA (TTM)

MSFT:

$200.96B

DKS:

$451.62B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFT vs. DKS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

DKS
DKS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DKS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DKS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DKS Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DKS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
DKS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFT vs. DKS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFTDKSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.13

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

1.22

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

2.81

-3.89

MSFT vs. DKS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFT Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the DKS Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFT and DKS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFT vs. DKS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, smaller than the maximum DKS drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and DKS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFTDKSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.38%

-73.33%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.91%

-19.37%

-14.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.91%

-32.73%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.15%

-48.79%

+11.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.15%

-70.82%

+33.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.46%

-8.44%

-19.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.78%

-17.96%

-3.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.48%

8.38%

+8.10%

Volatility

MSFT vs. DKS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is 10.52%, while DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS) has a volatility of 13.99%. This indicates that MSFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DKS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFTDKSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.52%

13.99%

-3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.31%

24.66%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.42%

35.97%

-10.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.66%

43.53%

-16.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.06%

45.34%

-18.28%

Dividends

MSFT vs. DKS - Dividend Comparison

MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than DKS's 2.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DKS
DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
2.78%2.45%1.92%2.72%1.62%6.17%2.22%2.22%2.88%2.37%1.14%1.56%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.91%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%

Financials

MSFT vs. DKS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Microsoft Corporation and DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00T2.00T3.00T4.00T5.00T20222023202420252026
82.89B
5.16T
(MSFT) Total Revenue
(DKS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MSFT vs. DKS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Microsoft Corporation and DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
67.6%
32.6%
Portfolio components
MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

DKS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.68T and revenue of 5.16T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.6%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

DKS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. reported an operating income of 450.65B and revenue of 5.16T, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.

DKS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. reported a net income of 319.82B and revenue of 5.16T, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSFT and DKS have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DKS has higher volatility (13.99%) compared to MSFT (10.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFT dropped -69.38% vs DKS's -73.33%.

DKS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFT and DKS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer