PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFT vs. BNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFT vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -18.85% return, which is significantly lower than BNDX's 1.02% return. Over the past 10 years, MSFT has outperformed BNDX with an annualized return of 24.39%, while BNDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.72% annualized return.


MSFT

1D
0.10%
1M
-3.36%
YTD
-18.85%
6M
-17.98%
1Y
-17.75%
3Y*
6.16%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*
24.39%

BNDX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.99%
YTD
1.02%
6M
1.22%
1Y
1.94%
3Y*
4.32%
5Y*
0.32%
10Y*
1.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFT vs. BNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-18.85%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%40.73%
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
1.02%2.86%3.57%8.77%-12.76%-2.29%4.65%7.87%2.81%2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFT and BNDX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFT vs. BNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDX
BNDX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFT vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFTBNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.10

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

0.66

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

1.84

-2.92

MSFT vs. BNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFT Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the BNDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFT and BNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFT vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than BNDX's maximum drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and BNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFTBNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.38%

-16.23%

-53.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.91%

-2.93%

-30.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.91%

-2.93%

-30.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.15%

-15.86%

-21.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.15%

-16.23%

-20.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.46%

-1.02%

-26.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.78%

-3.10%

-18.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.48%

1.05%

+15.43%

Volatility

MSFT vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a higher volatility of 10.52% compared to Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) at 1.49%. This indicates that MSFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFTBNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.52%

1.49%

+9.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.31%

2.96%

+19.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.42%

3.47%

+21.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.66%

4.89%

+21.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.06%

4.10%

+22.96%

Dividends

MSFT vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison

MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than BNDX's 4.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.47%4.39%4.18%4.42%1.51%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.91%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFT and BNDX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFT has higher volatility (10.52%) compared to BNDX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFT dropped -69.38% vs BNDX's -16.23%.

BNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFT and BNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer