PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFT vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MSFT vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -16.45% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 8.73% return. Over the past 10 years, MSFT has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 23.18%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 13.09% annualized return.


MSFT

1D
2.15%
1M
6.03%
6M
-12.13%
YTD
-16.45%
1Y
-20.50%
3Y*
6.20%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
23.18%
ALL TIME*
24.73%

^GSPC

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.76%
6M
7.25%
YTD
8.73%
1Y
18.21%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
13.09%
ALL TIME*
8.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFT vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-16.45%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%40.73%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
8.73%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFT and ^GSPC is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 1986

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between MSFT and ^GSPC has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFT vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFT vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFT^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.26

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

2.01

-2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.10

8.68

-9.78

MSFT vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFT Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFT and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFT vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFT^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.38%

-56.78%

-12.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.50%

-9.10%

-25.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.50%

-18.90%

-15.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.15%

-25.43%

-11.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.15%

-33.92%

-3.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.32%

-2.19%

-23.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.80%

-10.70%

-11.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.74%

2.10%

+16.64%

Volatility

MSFT vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a higher volatility of 10.25% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.13%. This indicates that MSFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFT^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.25%

3.13%

+7.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.51%

10.04%

+14.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.52%

12.62%

+14.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.07%

16.98%

+10.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.15%

18.06%

+9.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFT and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFT has higher volatility (10.25%) compared to ^GSPC (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFT dropped -69.38% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFT and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer