MSFT.NEO vs. VUAG.L

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L).

VUAG.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 14, 2019.

Performance

MSFT.NEO vs. VUAG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MSFT.NEO vs. VUAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MSFT.NEO Microsoft Corp CDR	-23.81%	12.97%	11.57%	56.83%	-29.06%	16.15%
VUAG.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating	-4.90%	12.22%	35.96%	23.20%	-12.82%	10.80%

Different Trading Currencies

MSFT.NEO is traded in CAD, while VUAG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUAG.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFT.NEO achieves a -23.81% return, which is significantly lower than VUAG.L's -4.90% return.

MSFT.NEO

• 1D: 2.79%
• 1M: -6.44%
• YTD: -23.81%
• 6M: -29.21%
• 1Y: -2.96%
• 3Y*: 7.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VUAG.L

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -4.41%
• YTD: -4.90%
• 6M: -2.64%
• 1Y: 13.42%
• 3Y*: 19.05%
• 5Y*: 13.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MSFT.NEO vs. VUAG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFT.NEO

MSFT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 35
MSFT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
MSFT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
MSFT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 31
MSFT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
MSFT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 37

VUAG.L

VUAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
VUAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
VUAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 57
VUAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
VUAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFT.NEO vs. VUAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSFT.NEO	VUAG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.11	0.80	-0.91
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.03	1.17	-1.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.17	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.12	0.99	-1.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.31	4.10	-4.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSFT.NEO vs. VUAG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFT.NEO Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFT.NEO and VUAG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSFT.NEO	VUAG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11	0.80	-0.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.95	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.87	-0.69

Correlation

The correlation between MSFT.NEO and VUAG.L is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MSFT.NEO vs. VUAG.L - Dividend Comparison

MSFT.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, while VUAG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MSFT.NEO Microsoft Corp CDR	1.31%	0.99%	1.01%	1.01%	1.39%	0.00%	0.00%
VUAG.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	71.39%

Drawdowns

MSFT.NEO vs. VUAG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFT.NEO drawdown since its inception was -37.84%, which is greater than VUAG.L's maximum drawdown of -27.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT.NEO and VUAG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFT.NEO	VUAG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.84%	-25.61%	-12.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.33%	-10.53%	-23.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.88%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.26%	-6.23%	-26.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.80%	-3.57%	-8.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.76%	2.76%	+10.00%

Volatility

MSFT.NEO vs. VUAG.L - Volatility Comparison

Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) at 3.81%. This indicates that MSFT.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFT.NEO	VUAG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.48%	3.81%	+2.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.18%	8.47%	+10.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.62%	16.74%	+9.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.96%	14.29%	+12.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.96%	36.39%	-9.43%