PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFH.TO vs. HUTE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFH.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Microsoft High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (MSFH.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFH.TO achieves a -14.71% return, which is significantly lower than HUTE.TO's 12.56% return.


MSFH.TO

1D
2.09%
1M
-0.58%
6M
-11.58%
YTD
-14.71%
1Y
-16.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HUTE.TO

1D
-0.93%
1M
-1.78%
6M
11.54%
YTD
12.56%
1Y
18.45%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFH.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSFH.TO and HUTE.TO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFH.TO vs. HUTE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFH.TO
MSFH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MSFH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

HUTE.TO
HUTE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
HUTE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUTE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUTE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
HUTE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUTE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFH.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Microsoft High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (MSFH.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFH.TOHUTE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.27

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

2.71

-3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.97

7.74

-8.71

MSFH.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFH.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the HUTE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFH.TO and HUTE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFH.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFH.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.00%, which is greater than HUTE.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFH.TO and HUTE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFH.TOHUTE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.00%

-18.35%

-12.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.00%

-6.85%

-24.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.17%

-4.33%

-18.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.87%

-3.92%

-5.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.11%

2.39%

+14.72%

Volatility

MSFH.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Microsoft High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (MSFH.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.91% compared to Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) at 5.43%. This indicates that MSFH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUTE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFH.TOHUTE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.91%

5.43%

+5.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.78%

10.62%

+11.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.35%

12.34%

+12.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.48%

14.63%

+8.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.48%

14.63%

+8.85%

Dividends

MSFH.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Dividend Comparison

MSFH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.13%, more than HUTE.TO's 9.34% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HUTE.TO
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF
9.34%9.64%10.24%10.72%1.61%
MSFH.TO
Harvest Microsoft High Income Shares ETF Class A Units
19.13%14.88%4.59%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFH.TO and HUTE.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFH.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while HUTE.TO is Derivative Income.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFH.TO and HUTE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer