MSEQX vs. DINDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MSEQX (Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I) and DINDX (Morgan Stanley Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund) are both mutual funds - MSEQX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Morgan Stanley, while DINDX is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Morgan Stanley. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.56% expense ratio.

Performance

MSEQX vs. DINDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) and Morgan Stanley Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DINDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MSEQX

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: 4.10%
• YTD: -1.20%
• 6M: -2.94%
• 1Y: 9.09%
• 3Y*: 29.17%
• 5Y*: 1.84%
• 10Y*: 17.37%

DINDX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSEQX vs. DINDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MSEQX Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I	-1.20%	24.78%	46.65%	50.36%	-60.18%	-0.00%	115.60%	38.25%	5.38%	43.91%
DINDX Morgan Stanley Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund	0.00%	8.28%	6.76%	8.49%	-7.06%	0.01%	5.10%	9.59%	-1.28%	7.54%

Correlation

The correlation between MSEQX and DINDX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 1997	0.13

Return for Risk

MSEQX vs. DINDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSEQX

MSEQX Risk / Return Rank: 5
MSEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
MSEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
MSEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
MSEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
MSEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSEQX vs. DINDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) and Morgan Stanley Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DINDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSEQX	DINDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.67	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.35	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.76	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSEQX	DINDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MSEQX	DINDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-69.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.64%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.89%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSEQX	DINDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.13%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.32%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.99%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.71%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.76%	—	—

MSEQX vs. DINDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MSEQX and DINDX have an expense ratio of 0.56%.

Dividends

MSEQX vs. DINDX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSEQX nor DINDX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DINDX Morgan Stanley Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund	2.69%	4.69%	5.36%	4.69%	5.82%	3.52%	2.98%	3.43%	3.68%	3.13%	6.24%	4.80%
MSEQX Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I	0.00%	0.00%	0.55%	0.05%	16.79%	24.24%	9.36%	21.39%	5.38%	21.18%	12.71%	7.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSEQX and DINDX in my portfolio?

MSEQX and DINDX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.