PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSEGX vs. MDOEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSEGX vs. MDOEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio (MSEGX) and Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity Portfolio (MDOEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSEGX achieves a -1.30% return, which is significantly lower than MDOEX's 18.37% return.


MSEGX

1D
-1.57%
1M
4.07%
YTD
-1.30%
6M
-3.05%
1Y
8.80%
3Y*
28.84%
5Y*
1.56%
10Y*
17.13%

MDOEX

1D
0.71%
1M
13.52%
YTD
18.37%
6M
17.83%
1Y
17.72%
3Y*
14.92%
5Y*
-2.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSEGX vs. MDOEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MSEGX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio
-1.30%24.43%46.29%49.87%-60.27%-0.31%87.26%
MDOEX
Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity Portfolio
18.37%8.28%16.79%5.36%-30.36%-18.69%45.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MSEGX and MDOEX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2020

0.64

The correlation between MSEGX and MDOEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSEGX vs. MDOEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSEGX
MSEGX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MSEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MSEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

MDOEX
MDOEX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MDOEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDOEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDOEX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MDOEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDOEX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSEGX vs. MDOEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio (MSEGX) and Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity Portfolio (MDOEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSEGXMDOEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.17

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

0.80

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.73

2.18

-1.45

MSEGX vs. MDOEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSEGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the MDOEX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSEGX and MDOEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSEGXMDOEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

0.80

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

-0.09

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.17

+0.25

Drawdowns

MSEGX vs. MDOEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSEGX drawdown since its inception was -69.57%, which is greater than MDOEX's maximum drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSEGX and MDOEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSEGXMDOEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.57%

-59.92%

-9.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.83%

-21.82%

-6.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.54%

-21.82%

-10.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.57%

-52.60%

-16.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.69%

-25.12%

+10.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.50%

-35.05%

+15.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.89%

7.96%

+4.93%

Volatility

MSEGX vs. MDOEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio (MSEGX) is 8.13%, while Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity Portfolio (MDOEX) has a volatility of 10.86%. This indicates that MSEGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDOEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSEGXMDOEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.13%

10.86%

-2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.31%

19.16%

+2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.99%

21.75%

+6.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.72%

23.58%

+16.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.79%

24.80%

+8.99%

MSEGX vs. MDOEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSEGX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than MDOEX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSEGX vs. MDOEX - Dividend Comparison

MSEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MDOEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDOEX
Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity Portfolio
0.62%0.74%0.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSEGX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio
0.00%0.00%0.42%0.00%18.70%26.52%10.03%22.75%5.67%22.18%13.17%7.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSEGX and MDOEX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDOEX has higher volatility (10.86%) compared to MSEGX (8.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSEGX dropped -69.57% vs MDOEX's -59.92%.

MDOEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSEGX and MDOEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer