MSEGX vs. JEPQ
MSEGX (Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) are both funds - MSEGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Morgan Stanley, while JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. MSEGX is actively managed, while JEPQ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MSEGX returned 23.36%/yr vs 20.72%/yr for JEPQ. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSEGX charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.
Performance
MSEGX vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSEGX achieves a -8.75% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ's 10.23% return.
MSEGX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- -8.75%
- 6M
- -8.31%
- 1Y
- 1.53%
- 3Y*
- 23.36%
- 5Y*
- -1.14%
- 10Y*
- 16.26%
JEPQ
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 10.23%
- 6M
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 29.39%
- 3Y*
- 20.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSEGX vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSEGX Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio | -8.75% | 24.43% | 46.29% | 49.87% | -31.44% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.23% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSEGX and JEPQ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.73 |
The correlation between MSEGX and JEPQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSEGX vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
MSEGX
JEPQ
MSEGX vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio (MSEGX) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSEGX | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.46 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 3.35 | -3.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.06 | 15.94 | -15.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSEGX vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSEGX drawdown since its inception was -69.57%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSEGX and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSEGX | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.57% | -20.07% | -49.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.83% | -8.82% | -19.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.54% | -20.07% | -12.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.13% | 0.00% | -21.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.50% | -3.41% | -16.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.26% | 1.85% | +11.41% |
Volatility
MSEGX vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio (MSEGX) has a higher volatility of 9.48% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 5.42%. This indicates that MSEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSEGX | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.48% | 5.42% | +4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.14% | 10.44% | +11.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.75% | 12.78% | +15.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.79% | 16.76% | +23.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.85% | 16.76% | +17.09% |
MSEGX vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSEGX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSEGX vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
MSEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.00% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSEGX Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 18.70% | 26.52% | 10.03% | 22.75% | 5.67% | 22.18% | 13.17% | 7.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSEGX and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSEGX has higher volatility (9.48%) compared to JEPQ (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSEGX dropped -69.57% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSEGX and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer