PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSED.L vs. SX5S.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSED.L vs. SX5S.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C (MSED.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MSED.L having a 6.29% return and SX5S.L slightly higher at 6.46%. Over the past 10 years, MSED.L has underperformed SX5S.L with an annualized return of 3.19%, while SX5S.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.41% annualized return.


MSED.L

1D
0.71%
1M
1.87%
YTD
6.29%
6M
7.61%
1Y
18.75%
3Y*
-10.77%
5Y*
-4.44%
10Y*
3.19%

SX5S.L

1D
0.35%
1M
1.56%
YTD
6.46%
6M
7.42%
1Y
18.48%
3Y*
15.51%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSED.L vs. SX5S.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSED.L
Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C
6.29%27.95%6.38%-45.01%-3.26%15.48%3.29%21.79%-10.43%14.38%
SX5S.L
Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
6.46%27.68%6.13%19.91%-3.67%14.48%2.12%23.51%-10.62%14.35%

Correlation

The correlation between MSED.L and SX5S.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2014

0.83

The correlation between MSED.L and SX5S.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.98 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MSED.L vs. SX5S.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSED.L
SX5S.L

Financial Services

25.6%
25.1%

Industrials

22.2%
22.1%

Technology

18.6%
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.8%

Healthcare

5.4%
5.4%

Energy

5.2%
5.2%

Utilities

4.7%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
5.5%

Communication Services

2.5%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.7%
3.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

MSED.L
25.6%
SX5S.L
25.1%

Industrials

MSED.L
22.2%
SX5S.L
22.1%

Technology

MSED.L
18.6%
SX5S.L
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MSED.L
10.1%
SX5S.L
9.8%

Healthcare

MSED.L
5.4%
SX5S.L
5.4%

Energy

MSED.L
5.2%
SX5S.L
5.2%

Utilities

MSED.L
4.7%
SX5S.L
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

MSED.L
4.0%
SX5S.L
5.5%

Communication Services

MSED.L
2.5%
SX5S.L
2.3%

Basic Materials

MSED.L
1.7%
SX5S.L
3.7%

Real Estate

MSED.L

-

SX5S.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSED.L vs. SX5S.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSED.L
MSED.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MSED.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSED.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSED.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MSED.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSED.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

SX5S.L
SX5S.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SX5S.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSED.L vs. SX5S.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C (MSED.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSED.LSX5S.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.23

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

1.62

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.56

5.40

+0.15

MSED.L vs. SX5S.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSED.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the SX5S.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSED.L and SX5S.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSED.LSX5S.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.23

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

0.69

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

0.73

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.59

-0.46

Drawdowns

MSED.L vs. SX5S.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSED.L drawdown since its inception was -58.05%, which is greater than SX5S.L's maximum drawdown of -32.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSED.L and SX5S.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSED.LSX5S.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.05%

-32.54%

-25.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.44%

-11.43%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.05%

-13.85%

-44.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.05%

-21.71%

-36.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.05%

-32.54%

-25.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.68%

-0.57%

-31.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.22%

-5.44%

-8.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

3.44%

-0.05%

Volatility

MSED.L vs. SX5S.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C (MSED.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L) have volatilities of 4.83% and 4.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSED.LSX5S.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

4.90%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.25%

12.23%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.02%

15.09%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.62%

17.62%

+12.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.74%

19.88%

+4.86%

MSED.L vs. SX5S.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSED.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SX5S.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MSED.L vs. SX5S.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSED.L nor SX5S.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, MSED.L and SX5S.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SX5S.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SX5S.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for MSED.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for MSED.L and 0.05% for SX5S.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSED.L and SX5S.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer